Shameless self-plug here. I wrote a blog post to document my methodology after having some issues with publicly available examples of using Podman and traefik in a best-practices config. Hopefully this finds the one other person that was in my shoes and helps them out. Super happy for feedback if others care to share.

  • StarkZarn@infosec.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The other poster here is correct, this is just an account of my journey through self hosting traefik, and ultimately headscale, without the hurdles along the way. I tried to include a few links to unclear terms along the way in the narrative, maybe those would help you figure things out. Unfortunately I can’t write for an audience of everyone, but hopefully you can still gain some value or learn some new things! Thank you for the feedback.

    • deadcatbounce@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Wasn’t being critical at all. Not expecting you to write for anyone.

      I wondered what this actually provides. If you were explaining to someone with a good knowledge of the world, not grandma!!

      • StarkZarn@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        No worries, and I’ll accept criticism too, that’s how you improve.

        Anyway, this is effectively giving you tailscale, a remote access mesh VPN solution, but with total control and ownership of the control plane server, instead of relying on the opaque tailscale owned and controlled infra. I touched on it briefly again the ‘DERP Config’ section of part 2: https://roguesecurity.dev/blog/headscale-quadlet-part2#DERP Config

        • deadcatbounce@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I’m not criticising you. I cannot validity criticise you, even if I was so inclined (I’m not), because I cannot proficiently grasp the subject matter. I would like to understand, NOT criticise. You’ve written an engaging piece which is opaque to me; apparently a contradiction. Hopefully I’ve rephrased that enough times to get across that no criticism is intended. 😁

          I don’t know the product names. I don’t tend to be focused on product names because they come and go. Your first message didn’t help me.

          Your last precis is just what I needed. Ideal. Thank-you. I now know what you’re trying to achieve.