Do your own math and just admit you were wrong. If the youngest is 1 and the oldest if 15, then over half of them are 0ast the point where they should know how to write and spell at least simple words. That also means most of them are not “very young” and that most of them are school age.
When I said “they are not in school yet” I was referring to my Gen A’s specifically. The ones you didn’t get were part of the joke that flew over your head.
You’d think someone trying to insult others about being able to read would have better reading comprehension skills.
I would also consider a median age under 10 to be very young in the context of generations.
My comprehension? You directly replied to a response about schools to talk about how your kids didn’t know all of their alphabets yet, but somehow thought everyone would get your “joke” because your kids aren’t in school yet.
Do your own math and just admit you were wrong. If the youngest is 1 and the oldest if 15, then over half of them are 0ast the point where they should know how to write and spell at least simple words. That also means most of them are not “very young” and that most of them are school age.
When I said “they are not in school yet” I was referring to my Gen A’s specifically. The ones you didn’t get were part of the joke that flew over your head.
You’d think someone trying to insult others about being able to read would have better reading comprehension skills.
I would also consider a median age under 10 to be very young in the context of generations.
My comprehension? You directly replied to a response about schools to talk about how your kids didn’t know all of their alphabets yet, but somehow thought everyone would get your “joke” because your kids aren’t in school yet.
So explain to me why you think that makes sense?
Everyone else but you seems to get it. It wasn’t subtle.
No they didn’t. That’s why ebolapie’s comment has so many more upvotes than yours. You really suck with context.