Like this: the aerial photograph of a military base was taken in the early 40s (during WWII) which at the time was considered classified, but if you compare satellite photos taken now: the surroundings are completely different (no signs of a former government facility) as the base closed down in the 70s then demolished. What sits there today is nothing but suburbia and a strip mall (should the photos be released even if its this old?)

  • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Who owns the air rights and how far.

    Are the photos taken 50 meters, 500 meters, 5000 meters, or 50 km off the ground?

  • modernangel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    A think a key nuance to the question is, was the photo taken from public airspace? The Supreme Court has affirmed, over and over, the right to photograph and film/video record anything in public, including privately-owned spaces visible from public spaces.

    Declassification is a separate issue, and hinges on ongoing security concerns. It’d be hard to make a compelling case for decommissioned and redeveloped site aerial photos still being somehow sensitive.