• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      That should be the answer, but thanks to Disney extending copyright to basically a century, the answer is no.

      You would think everyone clutching pearls about “rare books” would be on-board to relax that nonsense, so a corporation scanning every book could just post their scan. You would really think.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          … yes, the entire idea of copyright is that owning a copy is distinct from the right to sell more copies.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Right, but we’re not talking about owning, we’re talking about selling. The AI companies are buying these books. Which means someone is selling them.

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Are you confused by the concept of a used book store?

              They’re buying old books. Books that are no longer in print. These specific copies were produced legitimately, by the rightsholders, but new copies are no longer being made. Whether the publisher could reprint them might be legally or logistically complicated. More often, nobody cares.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        …why not?

        If it hasn’t been printed more than once in a literal century, is that really a loss?

        • Havatra@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Potentially, yes. Sure, it could just be some smut novel, but it could also provide insight into a certain group or people’s perspective on societal/political events at the time, contributing to a better painted big picture on an event we thought we knew all there is to know about.

          A very recent example is the VHS tapes that contained unseen and unpublished footage of Tiananmen Square.