• StiltedCurler@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d argue that’s it’s a negative feedback loop because the outputs are less good things: like a well sized middle class and a learned population.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not about good things or bad things

      Negative feedback loop: X is added to the system, which causes less X to be produced. Over time, the rate at which new X is appearing will go down.

      • This is the more common one in biology. As something starts to build up in your body, your body makes it so you don’t produce it as quickly (so you don’t ‘overdose’ on the chemicals you are making)

      Positive feedback loop: X is added to the system, which causes more X to be produced. Over time, the rate at which new X is appearing will go up.

      • This is more rare because it pushes to an extreme. Example might be birth, where pressure on the uterus causes the release of oxytocin, which causes contractions, which causes more pressure, even more oxytocin, etc. till birth is completed

      So in this case it’s a positive feedback loop regardless, because something is being pushed to the extreme.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No

          Ok fine:

          Reinforcement encourages a behavior, but the method depends

          • positive = add something good (ex. When they do something good, you give them a cookie)
          • negative = remove something bad (ex. When they do something good, you reduce the number of hours they have to work)

          The wording can flip the meaning, so don’t get too hung up on it

          • ex. Give a cookie (positive), could also be reducing hunger
          • ex. Reducing work hours (negative), could also be giving more vacation time
    • CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, there’s nothing to argue here. These are scientific definitions of the two terms. A positive feedback loop can be negative in terms of consequences, but it doesn’t change the fact that the loop is defined as a positive feedback loop.

      The words “positive” or “negative” in terms of the loop definition do not refer to “good” or “bad”, but rather the mathematical definitions of “additive/multiplicative” or “subtractive/divisive”. A positive feedback loop is an additive or multiplicative function whereby inputs increase outputs which increase inputs which increase outputs.

      A classic example is a snowball rolling down a hill that grows in size and gains speed. Whether or not the snowball grows big enough and rolls fast enough to annihilate the school at the bottom of the hill, it doesn’t change the fact that by definition the feedback loop that is generating a larger and larger and faster and faster snowball is defined as positive.

      An example of a negative feedback loop could be you getting sick. The input being viral or bacterial particles enter your body, the output is your body temperature increases, which kills the pathogens thereby decreasing the input. The decrease in pathogens then signals to your body that the infection is receding, and you body temperature returns to normal (decreased output). You healing from a sickness is a positive (good) thing, but the feedback loop that did it, is a negative one.