The Pennsylvania Democrat recalled his time serving as a Hillary Clinton surrogate in 2016, even after he supported Bernie Sanders in the primary.

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want someone in touch with the modern world, understands technology and climate change, and who will be around to feel the effects of the policies they’re enacting. Being old doesn’t rule out most of those qualifiers but a 70+ year old won’t be around to feel the effects of many policies enacted today, so they may be more willing to enact policies with short term benefits but long term detriments.

    If a 70 yr old wants to work on climate change regulation and tech regulation, they need to understand at least the basics of both, and the majority of legislators cannot use technology and refuse to begin to understand how computers or the internet in general work, despite the internet existing for 30 years and being everywhere for 20. And computers have in workplaces as commonplace for 40 years

    • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Al Gore was in his 60s when he won the Nobel for his work on environmental climate change. John Kerry, the current US Climate Envoy and the guy who got us back into the Paris Accords, is almost 80. They both know more than most on the issue.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exceptions not the rule, the majority of baby boomers are actively working against climate change and technology

        • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Perhaps in your imagination. We’ve passed the largest legislation for climate change ever, plus the CHIPS Act has brought high tech manufacturing and R&D back to the US.

                  • blazera@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Problem is it provided more money for climate accelerating things. Like more road infrastructure. Hoping for EV’s but americans are still trending to larger and larger gas guzzling trucks and SUVs.

                    Plus opening up new oil and gas extraction leases.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And there are/were younger, more energetic, and more knowledgeable options than both of them. The dinosaurs don’t have unique skills, they’re just names we’ve known for years. We have a country of 330M, there are plenty of talented and capable people to choose from.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            They give Nobels to people whose names are known. It wasn’t a recognition of brilliance, it was a recognition of impact. Put a younger, smarter, and more vibrant leader in place and they get it instead.

            • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Correction. They don’t give Nobles to people who don’t do things. But, no skin off my nose. If you have a younger, smarter, and more vibrant leader put them up for election and quit screaming at the clouds about age.