Instagram Is Full Of Openly Available AI-Generated Child Abuse Content
nucleo.jor.br
Nucleo's investigation identified accounts with thousands of followers with illegal behavior that Meta's security systems were unable to identify; after contact, the company acknowledged the problem and removed the accounts

Nucleo’s investigation identified accounts with thousands of followers with illegal behavior that Meta’s security systems were unable to identify; after contact, the company acknowledged the problem and removed the accounts

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldEnglish
    214·
    24 hours ago

    With a set of all images on the internet. Why do you people always think this is a “gotcha”?

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.worldEnglish
        82·
        22 hours ago

        Hey.

        I’ve been in tech for 20 years. I know python, Java, c#. I’ve worked with tensorflow and language models. I understand this stuff.

        You absolutely could train an AI on safe material to do what you’re saying.

        Stable diffusion and openai have not guaranteed that they trained their AI on safe materials.

        It’s like going to buy a burger, and the restaurant says “We can’t guarantee there’s no human meat in here”. At best it’s lazy. At worst it’s abusive.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          8·
          22 hours ago

          I mean, there is no photograph of a school bus with pegasus wings diving to the titanic, but I bet one of these AIs can crank out that picture. If it can do that…?

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldEnglish
          32·
          20 hours ago

          Ok, but by that definition Google should be banned because their trawler isn’t guaranteed to not pick up CP.

          In my opinion, if the technology involves casting a huge net, and then creating an abstracted product from what is caught in the net, with no steps in between seen by a human, then is it really causing any sort of actual harm?