CBS News, 10 years later

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well it’s not entirely wrong, as Marx and Lenin pointed out on petty bourgeoisie and their sentiment. Huge capitalists aren’t that dangerous under socialism, those are just few necks, but China did allowed petty burgies to grow and thrive and it now have tons of liberals which are constant danger.

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a good point. I am glossing over actual reasons why a liberalised China was viewed as being possible, and wasn’t a completely unreasonable view.

      I think that how i personally remember it from the time was the arrogance these views were expressed with. The way they treated China’s liberalization as a forgone conclusion that is the only possible outcome. It was still in the thick of The End of History, and there was a lot of unearned triumphilism from the US establishment

      • Buchenstr@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        this was during a time where the US was completely unchallenged economically, politically and military. There was quite a few times where this could’ve been the case, glad it never happened, as people now rightfully see just how western-style ‘democracy’ has really been.

        • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Us wasn’t unchallenged. They couldn’t win agaisnt the Taliban and had trouble agaisnt Iraq