• dwazou@jlai.luOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    The Dental Care Plan was part of the Political Agreement signed by Justin Trudeau and Jaghmet Singh. The other measures Justin Trudeau promised were Pharmacare and a law to protect striking workers against scabs. strike.

    In exchange for these 3 laws, the NDP agreed to not bring-down the Trudeau Government :

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeu-jagmeet-singh-deal-government-1.6393021

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/dental-care-ndp-jagneet-singh-analysis-wherry-1.6797866

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/anti-scab-labour-federally-regulated-workplaces-1.7023020

    I have my fair share of criticism with Jagmeet Singh. But I’m happy about what the NDP MPs achieved. Politics can be very ungrateful and brutal. Most Canadians may not be aware of it, but you made Canada a better country.

    **What now ? **

    This month, for the first time, the Dental Care Plan is expanding.

    Pharmacare was created. The hard thing is going to be managing these 2 plans properly. It will require honest and determined leadership. I think Mark Carney will try to capitalize on them.

    • Snowstorm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      NDP got decimated but they functionally still hold the same weight of bargaining power : give this government stability in exchange for advancing their ideas.

      The problem with this strategy being that, comes the next election, your own ideas won’t be differentiated from the ruling party and the next election will be a challenge.

      Carney could be smart to form an alliance with the Bloc for exactly this reason : the distance between Liberal ideas and the Bloc is quite small : obstruct their effectiveness at opposing you with an alliance.

      If the Bloc and NDP are smart they both ask for electoral reform as a condition to give the government stability.

      • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        cap·i·tal·ize /ˈkapədlˌīz/

        verb 1. take the chance to gain advantage from. “do they have what it takes to capitalize on this emerging opportunity?”

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          I mean how’s he going to capitalize on it? Like taking the credit for it to increase his political capital or use it to reverse-leverage NDP into supplying further votes for when he need them to play along?

          Please don’t provide dictionary definitions as an answer, its almost never going to be what the person was requesting clarification about and comes across a bit gauche. Like if someone asks how to define something, sure, but its not super helpful here

          • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Like taking the credit for it to increase his political capital

            Yes. It’s obvious that he would want to do that, because it shows that something meaningful has been done while he’s been in office regardless of who championed it. He has already done it on Twitter.

            Please don’t provide dictionary definitions as an answer, its almost never going to be what the person was requesting clarification about

            Emphasis mine. The definition answered your question enough that you intuitively knew exactly what I was suggesting, but hey, if you want I can delete it and you can wait for a response for the person you originally replied to. They’ll just say the same thing, but maybe you won’t be upset about it.

            • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Its more of a going concern, no concern about it staying or going and we’ve had a nice little sidebar out of it so Saul Goodman 🫡

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wish that it wasn’t dependent on household income or filing your tax return for the past year. Of course, dropping the means testing would also drop the tax filing requirement and probably save a ton of money on administration costs, but we can’t have people claiming a benefit they “don’t deserve,” now can we? I fucking hate neoliberalism. I hope this program stays, but is modified so that everyone can use it.

    • Snowstorm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Absolutely: higher income people are paying for most of the program with their taxes, why exclude them? I might be a strange blend of left and right but these programs: schools, hospitals, daycare and dental should all provide a minimum level of service for everyone regardless of their income and help establish the basis for a fair price for dental care. This is a stupid implementation and will be destroyed as soon as a conservative government happens in 2-4 years because both the left and right will be unconvinced.

    • dwazou@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Thank you so much. This means a lot to me.

      I come from a third world country with tremendous inequality. I was born in the most privileged classes.

      In my country, poor people who don’t pay a lot of money die like DOGS in hospitals. Private hospitals don’t hesitate to overcharge sick people as much as they can. If you are not happy, they let you die. We have mostly free elections. But they are useless. Because most of the time, useless and ignorant politicians get elected. Very few people read investigative journalism. In fact, our newspapers are mostly dead. I’m one of the very few people trying to financially support quality journalism in my country.

      I used to think our problems were specific. We are dumb. We are fools.

      Our problems are actually surprisingly common. I lived in many nations around the world. I noticed that in some countries, some cities, politicians can achieve absolutely outstanding things for public health, labor rights, good transit. They can really take great decisions. And I noticed that in some rich countries, like the United States, incredibly dumb and corrupt politicians can get massive popular support. And ordinary people pay the price:

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/02/10/inhaler-cost-death-optum-rx-walgreens/

      My conclusion was simple. Everything stems from the ordinary people. In corrupt places, like my country, people don’t pay attention to politics. They don’t educate themselves about policies. They don’t read quality newspapers. Few people get involved in the community. As a result, they can be easily lied to by oligarchs.

      In democracies that work great, like Denmark, you have ordinary people that educate themselves and actively get involved in their community. They support strong independent newspapers. They join community organizations pushing for change. They pay close attention to their MPs and their votes.

      If my comment helps people pay closer attention to politics, then I would have achieved my goal.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I keep telling people things like this. We always vote like these problems are because of one specific political party or political philosophy, but these problems are happening around the world, all at the same time, in countries with wildly diverse politics and histories and economics. It has little to do with the specific politics, at least not within the range of choices available to us. It is not the government we choose or have chosen that is the problem, it is the people, who are being beaten down by brutal economics, by an overwhelming wealth gap, by social media and traditional media relentlessly battering points of view into our faces. We are causing these problems, we are creating them, and we are enabling them. We are becoming the problem, because we are being made into the problem. Governments do have some responsibility to address this, but so do we. And we can’t trust the government to act on it, so we must. We must become political. We must not be afraid to speak up and speak out. We must be willing to put in the work, to do the leg work, to do the research, and sometimes just to show up. Even just to do the bare minimum is sometimes enough, when so often we choose to do nothing, not even the bare minimum. Learn what’s happening, form your opinion, and say your piece. It is your right, but also your duty.

        I’m not going to tell anyone how to vote, but I am going to tell you that you are ultimately responsible for the media you consume, and that you contribute. Angry rhetoric typically leads down a deadly path. Reject it. Embrace honesty and kindness whenever possible, if you are trapped in this flood of disinformation and you don’t know what point of view is true anymore, don’t reject them all, and certainly don’t just pick one, instead try your best to thoughtfully consider them all, weigh their importance yourself, and try to take the emotion out of the analysis. Especially negative emotions like fear and anger. They’re what are being used to manipulate you.