What VPN have you switched to after the Mullvad situation. I have looked at nym and ivpn. But don’t know if they are any good.

  • Rhonda Sandtits@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I have 5 days left, looks like I’m not gonna renew.
    I find the support of that political party pretty disturbing.

    I think I am just going to use tor for general browsing. Mullvad IP addresses get blocked just as much as tor these days anyway.

  • DoomSayer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Had a bad experience with Nym. It’s not compatible with GrapheneOS. It runs, but there’s a data limit that in my experience kept getting artificially hit by the forming and breaking of connections that occurs when switching GOS profiles. Maybe this happens less on stock Android?

    Regardless, I had to keep contacting their support for extensions. In 6 years, I haven’t yet had to contact Mullvad support. It just works!

    I experienced DNS leaks when Nym claimed it was ‘fully’ connected. Mullvad.net could ‘see’ where I was located. That’s not considering that in general the connection with Nym was much slower than Mullvad. Nym offered me an extended free trial, but I haven’t claimed it yet. Reckon they’ll need another couple of years to iron out the obvious issues.

    In summary, Nym felt like a very early prototype much more than a production-ready service.

  • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I use AirVpn as they allow port forwarding and are reasonably priced. They are no logs and allow payment through non-bank methods

    • chmod755@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      AirVPN is great, I am using it right now. Paid with crypto and signed up with an anonymous email address

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It really depends on whether you care or not about State Surveillance.

    If you don’t and only really care about general privacy and things like not getting letters from lawyers demanding money because you torrented something, then any no-logs VPN will do:

    • For starters just having a VPN means it’s not just a case of a lawyer claiming to represent a copyright owner demanding from a local ISP the identification of the user of a specific IP at a specific time (which many countries have made laws to facilitate, so they don’t even need a court order) so now they probably need a court order
    • Then if the VPN is in a different legal jurisdiction said court order needs to be from a court there, not where you are. Even if said lawyer are there and get that court order, they still need the ISP in a different country to give them the information of the user whose IP is in the VPN logs, so that’s a lot more complex.
    • Then if the VPN has no-logs, they can’t even get the user IP address because it’s nowhere to be found. They would need a court order to install what’s basically wiretapping equipment or software in that VPN in order to catch a user whilst they’re actually using that connection to torrent some file or other. No court is going to be issuing a wiretapping order for a VPN provider to catch a non-commercial case of copyright violation.

    If, however, you care about State Surveillance, then merely a no-logs VPN isn’t necessarily safe anymore. You see several countries, such as the US and UK, have special surveillance courts (such as FISA courts in the US) which can issue court orders to facilitate data access for mass surveillance WHICH THE RECIPIENTS CANNOT PUBLICLY ADMIT THEY’RE UNDER. In other words, the wiretapping equipment/software to allow bulk tracking of what users are doing might already be installed at the no-logs VPN (and they cannot tell you about it otherwise they’ll literally end up in jail) so it’s not in fact no-logs because the likes of the NSA is actually logging it all. Any VPN hosted in such legal jurisdictions can be the target of it, any company registered in such legal jurisdictions can be the target of it and it doesn’t matter how honest and pro-privacy the people in those companies are - I vaguely remember the case of a secure e-mail provider in the US (forgot the name now), who tried to fight one such court order and ultimately the only way they found to do so was to close down the service and their company.

    So if you VPN company is for example registered in Gibraltar (which is a British jurisdiction) or the US and they’re still operating, they’re very likely compromised and even if they’re not, they can silently be compromise at any time.

    If you care about avoiding mass surveillance from actual governments, then beyond the usual autocratic nations you’ll want to avoid VPN exit points in and VPN providers based in or registered in at the very least the US, UK and Israel and any of the regions under their jurisdiction (for example Gibraltar and the Channel Islands for Britain, Puerto Rico for the US), probably more broadly all the 5-Eyes nations (so, the first 2 plus Canada, Australia and New Zealand).

    So check were that “wonderful no-logs VPN” company is registered and were is based and avoid those in countries with insane civil society surveillance legislation like the Patriot Act and even avoid exit nodes of other VPN companies in such countries.

  • placebo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I switched from Mullvad before this because they thought I was paying 5 EUR each month to solve a captcha on their website. Proton VPN is what I’m using rn.

  • withheldWitch77@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I use self-hosted on a cloud bought by crypto, but it’s primarily because my relatives living in a country with almost all VPN solutions and protocols blocked, so you always need to figure everything out yourself and try something new.

    • zephiriz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What cloud service would you recommend? Maybe I’m over thinking I but I was looking into offshore VPS. But don’t know if I really want to go through it all.

  • knomie@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve been using nym for a few month now. It generally works and I’m convinced by the project. However, they are still implementing features and there are often small issues (slow connections, no servers found, needs new permissions on Linux after update, etc.)

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        You can benefit from both a commercial VPN provider as well as at-home hosted.

        My Asus WRT router, which I flashed with Merlin firmware, has a feature called “VPN Director”, I can connect to 5 different VPN clients at a time and forward my devices connections individually through each one.

        My Asus router also has the option to host a WireGuard Server which i then forward through one of the VPN clients with the VPN director.

        Essentially creating a multi-hop network, the flow goes a little like such;

        Device -> WireGuard Tunnel -> Home Network -> WireGuard Tunnel -> Commercial VPN Server

        The commercial VPN is my endpoint therefore what the internet sees when I browse however I also benefit from my PiHole which handles my DNS queries an blocklists.

  • Hexarei@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Host one yourself on a cloud host that accepts cryptocurrency and asks no questions, if you want to do piracy. Otherwise if you’re just trying to get your traffic cloaked for privacy reasons, a digital ocean droplet or a hetzner instance running OpenVPN is plenty.

    • Starkon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      maybe a dumb question but isn’t a hetzner instance directly connected to one’s identity? I remember when setting up mine, they asked for ID verification. If so then the outgoing IP which is public is linked to my ID and would be a bigger risk of itself. Correct me if I’m wrong.

      • Hexarei@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, but if you want privacy, it’s a fine idea to prevent public networks and such from examining your traffic patterns. My personal main use case for a self-hosted VPN is for using public networks for private traffic, and I wouldn’t suggest doing hardcore high volume piracy through such a thing.

        The idea of using one for piracy is more focused on finding a VPS provider that can accept cryptocurrency and doesn’t require your personal details.

        Edit: whoops, realized I got the premises backwards in my earlier comment. Sorry about that.

  • starsoaked_lily@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    ivpn is the only one on the list privacy-guides recommends other than mullvad and proton - obviously their recommendations aren’t law but a good starting point for looking into things yourself

  • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I switched away from Mullvad when they killed port forwarding years ago. I have used AirVPN since and it has always been pretty good!

  • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Personally I’m not using any of them that haven’t been raided and proven not to keep records and as far as I know Mullvad is the only one who fits that bill.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Im broke as hell so I’m using pia right now, I very much regret it I will probably switch to nym as soon as my subscription runs out.