• spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This technically makes this an ad for adblockers. Which, by enabling an adblocker, will disable said ad.

  • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take: I don’t want / need more people to use adblock.

    Right now it is in a good position where the numbers just are not that high for advertisers to really give a hoot. Yes there is the ocasional shit like with YouTube, but the thing is - they are not really trying, they only put enough effort in to inconvenience, hoping more people will drop blocking.

    However, if more people start blocking, I think they will be forced to find more concrete solutions, like the whole DRM fiasco.

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If ads were just ads, then sure. But now that they serve as trackers too, and are oftentimes hijacked by malware… yeah no, screw all ads.

  • TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not joking, every time a website asks me to turn off my adblocker, I leave and put it on my blocklist so it never shows up again. Then I simply use their competition instead.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Graham is awesome. I remember working with him 20 years ago as an ISV rep and he’s come such a long way.

  • umbraroze@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it’s totally fashionable to give people who still somehow use Microsoft Internet Explorer scare pop-ups, so why not this?

    If you don’t run an ad blocker, your browser just isn’t safe. This was the security community consensus 15 years ago. Shit sure got worse since then!