• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    then they have the ability to host a website just as much as they have the ability to answer the phone

    Many people in the developed world are behind CGNAT. Paying for an Ipv4 is a premium, and most businesses either setup shop on an existing listing page (e.g. facebook), or host a website from website provider/generator.

    A phone number is public, accessible, and an AI can get realtime info from a scrawled in entry in a logbook using OCR

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So for one, business lines almost always have public IPv4. Even then, there are a myriad of providers that provide a solution even behind NAT (also, they probably have public IPv6 space). Any technology provider that could provide AI chat over telephony could also take care of the data connectivity path on their behalf. Anyone that would want to self-host such a solution would certainly have inbound data connectivity also solved. I just don’t see a scenario where a business can have AI telephony but somehow can’t have inbound data access.

      So you have a camera on a logbook to get the human input, but then that logbook can’t be a source of truth because the computer won’t write in it and the computer can take bookings. I don’t think humans really want to do a handwritten logbook anyway, a computer or tablet ui is going to be much faster anyway.