• thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The now I hear about GTA6, the more confident I get that my pessimism towards this franchise’s future is warranted.

    No Dan Houser, no Lazlow Jones, hell - probably NONE of the same dev team at all from GTAV (let alone earlier).

    This is likely going to end up some weird “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” style monster where some gatcha/shark card filled “live service” is going to go around masquerading as the next entry in this franchise.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I doubt the writing is going to be as good. I have a feeling it will be seriously watered down slop.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s been dead to me since they dropped talk of expansion stories on gta v.

        GTA is dead. What they are calling GTA today, isn’t. The multi player trash killed the franchise.

        For the vast majority of today’s gamers, gta v is all gta has ever been so I’m sure it will sell well but gta v was the weakest gta in the series because they pivoted hard in a direction that has nothing to do with the original concept.

        The point was starting from nothing with a story that lead to be top of the areas crime world. The moment they added a never ending competition where no one can ever achieve full domination of the environment, the escapism died.

        • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Whoa. Are well articulated positions still allowed on today’s Internet?

          Tbf, i enjoyed the shit out of gta online. For about a month.

  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I have to play it with another human being, I will not play it. I play games to escape from the rest of the species not engage with them.

        • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          that is true for every single multiplayer game. they will not bother to make anti-cheat for Linux

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            EAC is one of the most popular anticheats and it has a Linux version. The hardest thing developers need to do is decide to allow Linux, the actual implementation takes less time than a coffee break.

            What you’re saying literally isn’t true. For example you can play The Finals on Linux and that’s a multiplayer only game.

          • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Not exactly, I play Halo MCC online, Dead by Daylight, Splitgate, etc. Lots of multiplayer games work fine for me. I use EOS btw

          • Lesrid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Even worse, there’s no worthy benefit for kernel anti-cheat. Linux players are being excluded for reasons that have no purpose for players.

              • Lesrid@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                So the reason why Linux players can’t play is because the anti-cheat hooks into the kernel of the OS. And the anti-cheat is made for the Windows kernel. It is entirely possible for them to make one that is compatible with Linux but they won’t. Besides, hooking into the kernel does not offer complete protection against cheats.

                So hooking into the kernel is unwarranted given that the anti-cheat software is potentially able to transmit malware and observe everything on your computer since it has direct access to the kernel, even though cheating is still possible.

        • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh, that sucks! I’d say just play it on a PS2 because modding has gotten easier and cheaper for it these days, but I recently priced out some options for my cousin and it was way more than I thought. Like, if you get a system that boots but can’t read discs for $30, that’s a pretty good deal! And the easiest and cheapest option is a $20 memory card from AliExpress that you can load FreeMCBoot on, and all your games. But then you have to add in the controller, and those as-is systems usually don’t come with a power supply. And you likely need an HDMI adapter. I don’t know if you can put the whole thing together for under $100.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 days ago

    and potentially their brand sponsors

    Well, there it is. In-game ads in the form of “user-generated content”, from the sound of it. Also has paid mod vibes.

    Hope I’m wrong and it’s actually great.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    Makes sense, considering what people have been doing with it like with Fivem. Players did more to extend the life of GTAV (and IV) than Rockstar.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah took them years to recognise the value in FiveM. At first they trued banning its makers, even sending private investigators after one, and accused it of being a tool to facilitate piracy. Then they changed the rules to allow non commercial mods online in 2022, and finally bought the makers in 2023.

      I still find it a bit bizarre they’re not launching on PC at the same time as the consoles. Its the PC landscape where all the modding comes from, and PC is the single biggest gaming platform. But in fairness simultaneous launches are risky, and PC launches are more complex in terms of the breadth of hardware that needs supporting. But it’ll be PC that facilitates the most user generated content.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think they’re just banking on selling the game twice to a lot of people, to be honest. It’s the most hyped game in like a decade, a lot of people will be buying it on console release just because they can’t wait (assuming the usual delay of about a year until the PC release). A non-trivial amount of those will buy it again on PC later.

      • k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        On consoles it is much easier for them to control the user generated content.

        I will also assume whatever tools that are planned to be implemented into the game to allow user modification are still very much in their infancy, so yeah a PC launch just makes all that much more complex.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Fuck off trying to describe anything as ‘a metaverse.’ That’s like trying to own ‘an internet.’

    If there’s more than one, there are zero.

  • loam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    With buzzwords like metaverse being thrown around, I’m imagining a GTA6 that has brand partnership NFTs. Like when Madden/FIFA added Nike items in 2023.

    But that would never happen, since GTA is known for satirizing brands and corporate behavior, right? Besides, these brands would never want to be shown alongside gamer-generated content…

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      GTA online apparently made them a crazy amount of money so it’s going to be more of that type of game for a long time.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      they are always released first as a console exclusive and then the PC version comes out later. they make more money that way because of contracts and capitalism. every single game they have made so far has been extremely good

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was going to be mildly upset I couldn’t play multiplayer If I pirate it. Now I’m dodging a bullet.

  • Suppoze@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    GTA V Online already are those in a way, no? I can’t blame them for leaning into it. I’m not interested anyway.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Basically. Though official scripting support is what turned Roblox from a social lego game to one of the largest videogames on earth. In my own time on roblox, the biggest thing was cloud persistence for the scripting API that allowed people to make studio-level games.

      Modding on GTA is still technically unsupported and unofficial. You really have a restricted sandbox for anything that R* will accept on their servers.

      GTA is more like a secondlife or club penguin than it is a roblox atm.

      EDIT: so modding is going towards an “official” capacity apparently. That’ll be what turns GTA from clun penguin to Roblox, proverbially.