• frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I mean, there’s zero evidence that he was even real.

    I’m saying if you read the Bible, Jesus’s teachings align with socialism.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The consensus of scholars that focus on academic history of that time agree that it is extremely likely that some guy named Yeshua lived around that time and place and tried to reform Judaism as others were doing at the time (the Pharisees were the reformers that ended up being successful).

      There’s a whole FAQ about this on reddit’s askhistorians that goes into detail but essentially if you argue Yeshua of Galilee never existed you cannot then accept that most historical figures were real as we have similar evidence for the existence of many people.

      And Im saying they might be more anarchistic beliefs than socialist beliefs as the NT isn’t pushing a pro-governance view.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        if you argue Yeshua of Galilee never existed you cannot then accept that most historical figures were real as we have similar evidence for the existence of many people.

        What evidence exists? I mean, we have literally multiple accounts and writings by Aristotle… Or Eratosthenes… Who would be, by and large, contemporaries, at this scale…

        Yet for Yeshua? We don’t even have birth records, which would have been meticulous, especially since a census happened at the same time. We can’t even confirm most of the documented events that were claimed.

        In fact, all writings that state he existed weren’t even written until about 70 years after he purportedly died (Which we have no Roman records of the time, indicating even a scenario as described, which is kinda shocking).

        In all likelihood, he is an amalgamation of several radical figures, as most of his story was cribbed from earlier, already extant, savior mythology.

        • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Bo we have writings we believe were written by Aristotle because other people from around that time say he did. We have similar things for jesus such as the writings of people who recorded the existence of people who followed a guy named Jesus a few decades after his death. It would ge really odd for people around the Mediterranean to all follow the teachings of a guy who they call by the same name who never existed.

          https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/259vcd/comment/chf3t4j/?context=3

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            44 minutes ago

            We have similar things for jesus such as the writings of people who recorded the existence of people who followed a guy named Jesus a few decades after his death.

            Yes, we have contempory, verified sources of Aristotle’s lectures, and writings.

            We have no such thing for Yeshua. The earliest is, as you say, “a few decades”, aka 70 years. That’s two entire generations. Nothing contemporary, and in fact, contemporary documents actually contradict much of what was written.

            It would ge really odd for people around the Mediterranean to all follow the teachings of a guy who they call by the same name who never existed.

            And yet, here were are, writing about a mystical man in the sky… Who never existed, as far as any evidence tells us. And, in fact, whatever evidence we DO find, contradicts the claims made by adherents to that mythology.

            Hell, how many Romans wrote about how awesome on the field of battle Hercules was… Pretty certain a demigod never existed by the name of Hercules.

            BTW, from your link:

            “There is no physical or archaeological evidence tied to Jesus, nor do we have any written evidence directly linked to him”