Do you think the title is true or false? In my opinion, I think Jokic clears Wilt Chamberlain offensively. Wilt is probably the better scorer due to the records but skill wise, Jokic clears him via the eye test with his insane skill gap and that compensates for Wilt’s athleticism gap. Nothing more to say on playmaking because Jokic is easily the greatest playmaking big of all time.

Does Jokic’s efficiency and skill gap offset Wilt’s record breaking numbers and athleticism or do you think Wilt is just better offensively?

  • walter_____pinkman@fediverser.communick.devB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I remember an effortpost someone made on here in which he adjusted Wilt’s stats for pace along with some other factors iirc and while still impressive they drop from unbelievable to more or less prime Shaq-level, again still great but the muh 100 points/50 ppg argument def mythologizes Wilt’s offensive output. And at least Shaq could maintain his numbers in the postseason, same with Jokic, Wilt however always wilted somewhat lol, so idk there probably is an argument for Jokic over Wilt offensively.

  • Rrekydoc@fediverser.communick.devB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just to be clear, Jokic is not more efficient for his era. Nearly every year Wilt set the record for points, he was scoring with efficiency as impressive as Jokic’s first MVP season. When Wilt was scoring as little as prime Jokic, he was as efficient or moreso.

    You seem to be overestimating the skill gap. Wilt was generally much more skilled as a scorer, but he didn’t have the range or reliable free throws Jokic does (Jokic’s greatest scoring gift is how terrified offenses are to crowd him). Jokic is better a passer, but not by as much as you seem to think; Wilt was still doing things we haven’t seen Jokic do or at least do quite as well as Wilt.

    Wilt had high “basketball iq” and even Jerry West said he was one the best at knowing what the other players were going to do before they did it.

    Other than shooting range, Jokic’s biggest offensive gap is being a fantastic floor general. While Wilt proved he could facilitate the greatest offense the game had ever seen, he wasn’t making that level of adjustments in his team’s schemes to create or exploit flaws in his opponent’s defense.

    Wilt was drafted only a year before Oscar Robertson and everyone then still considered Wilt to be the “greatest offensive player ever”.

    The fact that Jokic is in the conversation and is still improving is downright amazing… but there’s no way I’m crowning him this early in his career.

  • HaikuPapi@fediverser.communick.devB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    No one knows. I have Wilt in my top 5 ever. He’s the statistically the most dominant statistical player ever and we don’t know how many blocks he had, but some redditor did an evaluation of over 100 games and found it was like over 8 a game or something nuts.

    Like you can try to adjust for pace, competition, or reduce wilt’s minutes to the current league average (which makes zero sense based on how many MPG he averaged), but the reality is that he averaged 50 for a season. Put up 100 in a game. and is one of two players to average more than 30 for his career, and that was with a big fall off.

  • maddogfarm@fediverser.communick.devB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    wilt an unstopable scoring machine, we will probably never see another big man put up 100 points in an game, when people talk stat padding he basically invented that.

    Unless the nba adds an 4/5 point line in the future perhaps changes in the rules that favor jokic maybe but it seems highly unlikely.

    • Rrekydoc@fediverser.communick.devB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      For most of his career, Wilt was averaging twice the possessions that Jokic played this past year.

      Per possession isn’t really a fair comparison.