fossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoWhy Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badlywww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1500arrow-down113cross-posted to: technology@zerobytes.monstertechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1487arrow-down1external-linkWhy Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badlywww.zdnet.comfossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square84fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@zerobytes.monstertechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareairglow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-219 hours agoThat’s incorrect. GPL licenses are open source. The GPL does not restrict anyone from selling or distributing GPL-licensed software as a component of an aggregate software distribution. For example, all Linux distributions contain GPL-licensed software, as the Linux kernel is GPLv2.
That’s incorrect. GPL licenses are open source.
The GPL does not restrict anyone from selling or distributing GPL-licensed software as a component of an aggregate software distribution. For example, all Linux distributions contain GPL-licensed software, as the Linux kernel is GPLv2.