• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 days ago

    What a frivolous waste of congressional speaking time. I thought these guys had real problems to solve? I thought Trump was gonna fix it all this time around? You’re telling me not even 1 week into his new term and he’s already thinking about how the job won’t be done in time?

    Conservatives are pathetic.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s basically what I’ve been posting on Social Media anytime shit like this happens.

      “How does this lower grocery prices?”

      Ask whenever the Right or Center is listening, keep the message on “Trump is distracting you from what he isn’t doing, but should.”

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Thank you for saying grocery instead of egg. So many people say eggs and it is going to age like milk when the bird flu recedes even though groceries will generally still be expensive otherwise.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      If this fails, you can expect them to redefine what a “term” means. And if that fails they can simply cancel elections under “emergency” conditions and keep him in office for longer.

      … and if that fails, they can just say “too bad” and do whatever they want anyway because who’s going to stop them?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      I just want to point out that this is just one of the many many campaign promises he is trying to fulfill. Sure, it’s a big deal. But simply saying “conservatives are pathetic” is not only reactionary, it is wrong. Look at what is happening to immigrants. You might not see them as a problem, but conservatives do, and they are “solving” it.

      Just saying, this shit is way scarier this time around. They’re fuckin’ moving.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      On the other hand, better they do nothing than actuality successfully fucking everything up.

      • psud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        The worry is that perhaps Trump is smarter than he appears, and all he’s doing is showing his followers that he’s still all about setting up a autocratic government which they’ll get to be the muscle for, ready to do a violent takeover the moment elections stop working (just like last time, but this time better armed and better organised)

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Trump, if anything, is much less smart than he appears. The guy managed to bankrupt a casino. That takes a special kind of stupid.

  • waywardninja@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    From the article:

    Ogles’ resolution is tailored specifically to permit Trump to serve a third term, but not to allow three out of the four living former presidents to serve third terms.

    It’s a Trump only privilege which, given the track record, could have been assumed, unfortunately.

  • DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    A constitutional amendment required 2/3s House and Senate AND 3/4 of states. And they don’t have that. This is more bullshit to distract.

    To amend the U.S. Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states). Alternatively, an amendment can be proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures, but this method has never been used.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is more bullshit to distract.

      This is saying it louder for the people in the back. Musk’s Nazi Salute isn’t getting the message across? Okay, how about this?

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 days ago

        They so desperatly want a hidden militia to come out of the woodwork and coup the country for them

        Those people are either dead from covid, too old to fight for their coup, or are just LARPers and actually aren’t interested in dying for a con man.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That would also be an amendment to the Constitution.

        The last amendment that passed took over 200 years to get through the process.

      • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        the same amount,

        The United States Constitution Article V:

        The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It obviously won’t get close to passing but it would be incredible for Democrats if it did. He has zero margin in the House, nothing major is passing into law except tax cuts. All his executive order policies are inflationary.

    So either he’s crashing the economy, taking the blame for continued inflation, or getting nothing of consequence done. And he’d be 83 and asking for four more years. He’d get crushed.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      We’ve played this game twice now. Let’s not try a third game of fascism chicken

      That said Obama vs trump would be a funny campaign. “My fellow Americans, look at this absolute buffoon. You want proof I’m a natural born citizen? I’ve been stuck here with him too.”

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          And while i think he’d struggle in that scenario I’ve gotten very wary of people (myself included) thinking “he can’t possibly win in this scenario” because that’s twice now been the prelude to defeat. Wheras in 2020 he was taken as a serious threat from the start

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          That was one race, and during a pandemic that probably would have lost the race for any incumbent, whether it made logical sense or not.

          Frankly I kind of wish he won his second term if he had to get another term at all. His bruised ego over losing, fear of legal consequences, and time away to stew on this have made him a far more dangerous president than last time.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Of course he will wreck the rather healthy US economy and break the unemployment record again, which he currently holds from his 1st term.

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    To amend the United States Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the states. The process is outlined in Article V of the Constitution.

    Congress: A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required

    Constitutional convention: Two-thirds of state legislatures must call for a convention

    Ratification: Three-fourths of state legislatures or conventions must ratify the amendment

    Each state legislature must vote on the amendment in an up-or-down vote

    State legislatures cannot change the language of the amendment

    This is DOA

    • AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seriously. It’s obviously abhorrent, but thankfully as of now there’s zero chance of it passing. Save your energy for the many things that warrant shock and disgust.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Trump is not exactly a spring chicken. He is one mild medical event to being in the history book.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      COVID nearly killed him and RFK is antivax sycophant. I’m not a betting man but…

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Great, than we end up with Vance aka the young, healthy, couch-fucking, monarchist who lacks Trump’s compulsive need for worship.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Vance used to be the face of Never Trump, which makes his actual motives a mystery. The best possibility would rely on him pulling a long con, but so would the worst possibility.

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why aren’t the “left” arming themselves while an obvious fascist takes power? “LOL”

        • nomy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I know a few but when I tell people online to prepare they’re mostly dismissive if not outright hostile. I’m sure most of them will disavow any politics and kneel when it’s time to rat on their neighbors.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Probably confused as hell watching the democrats refusing to drop gun control as part of their platform after an attempted insurrection and police violence repeatedly happening with no justice system reform.

      But the blue conservatives were never really about representing people. What else did I expect?

      ‘Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary’ - Karl Marx

    • TiaNati@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s a really dangerous way of thinking. We can no longer normalize this stuff by going “it’ll never actually happen.” It CAN happen. Get your head out of the sand and stop minimizing the very real threat our democracy is facing.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        What democracy? We’ve been living in a police state our entire lives. Talk about a dangerous way of thinking, ffs, how many hundreds of thousands of people were murdered under the Bush administration alone, and you act like that was just healthy democracy? Why were Bush and Obama on the same page about the erosion of our civil liberties and global imperialism? I swear, some of you are just miles from the correct explanation.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        This one won’t happen though. It doesn’t have the votes. It would require a Constitutional amendment, and thus a LOT of Democrats on board.

        You can’t freak out about every possible thing.

    • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      And we were all overreacting about Roe v Wade. “Precedent”, “established law”, “checks and balances”. It could never happen, they said.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I really would like to see some of those checks and balances I’ve heard so much about. Must have gotten confused—it’s cheques for the rich, on our dime, to make their balance keeps going up.

    • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Reminder that they control all branches of government and can do whatever the hell they want.

      Even though I partially agree that it’s probably somebody sucking up instead of them passing a “remove all term limits” bill instead.

      Or maybe they’re just testing the waters and compliance of the people currently elected, heck if I know.

  • blackberry@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms," the amendment states. Former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all served two consecutive terms, and thus would be barred from being elected to a third term. But not Trump, who is the first president since Grover Cleveland in 1892 to be elected to a second, non-consecutive term.