• Risk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Conspiratorial? What?

    Large Language Models cannot be genuinely creative; I agree. The people using them can. Why is that disagreeable?

          • Risk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, I really didn’t - but I can’t exactly stop your confirmation bias.

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sighhhhh

              it is so tiresome being lied to when the evidence is a short scroll above

              it really does stink of being obstinately against change for no reason other than it being change.

              • Risk@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                As I said, I can’t fix your confirmation bias.

                I wasn’t pointing to a conspiracy, merely the fact that the criticism voiced so far doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

                Edit:

                I just realised you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

                Those are two different topics.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

                  So, just being against progress. Like I said.

                  you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

                  Lol no.

                  • Risk@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    against progress

                    Who? Artists, generally or those upset that AI/LLMs have been taught from their work? Not what I’m implying at all, as already highlighted extensively.

                    People criticising AI/LLM art as ‘not art/not creative’? Yes.

                    If you’re not conflating my argument, then you are either being really fucking stupid or deliberately trolling. In either case, I’m done wasting my time on you.