• Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    @Risk @Prunebutt, the risk is when we lose our own capabilities and intelligence, becoming dependent on AI. This has already happened with previous technologies. Who still has the handwriting of our grandparents with the introduction of the keyboard and word processors? Who can still do simple sums mentally for purchases at the supermarket, without using a calculator? With the introduction of smartphones, our lives have become completely dependent on these gossips in practically every aspect, social as well as professional.
    Seeing this evolution, I always think of the humans in the movie Wall-e as the end result of this path. It is not that AI is going to fight and subjugate humanity, it does not need to do so, since we subordinate ourselves to it voluntarily, even today we would be unable to survive a week without our technology.
    It happens when we start using tools, not for what they are, but as crutches for our own inability and intelligence, instead of using them for our own development.

    • Risk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is quite a hyperbolic analysis.

      Yeah, good quality handwriting is less prevalent now than it has been in the past - but that’s not because of a loss of artistry, but because that mode of written communication is less important. But there are still plenty of calligraphy artists out there, and are perhaps more highly prized now than they were before.

      Human creativity doesn’t stop, we just progress to new tools when the previous ones can be automated. And yet, even then, we still have people that go back to use the old tools for the simple joy of using them.

      Don’t mistake delegation for subordination.