ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoPaniki.postimg.ccimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down139
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1imagePaniki.postimg.ccickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square133fedilink
minus-squarevortic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·edit-21 year agoI’d forgotten this trick. It works for large numbers too. 122,300,223÷3 = 40,766, 741 1+2+2+3+2+2+3 = 15
minus-squarechooglers@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up41arrow-down1·1 year agothrew up and died while reading this
minus-squaresaltesc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago^ This. The thing about Arsenal is they always try and walk it in.
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoThe neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoProve it for 2, then un-distribute.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThere is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2
I’d forgotten this trick. It works for large numbers too.
122,300,223÷3 = 40,766, 741
1+2+2+3+2+2+3 = 15
threw up and died while reading this
I wish I could read 😞
Just squint and wing it.
That is way too accurate. Lol
^ This. The thing about Arsenal is they always try and walk it in.
The neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
But how do I prove it for 6
Get 6 apples. Duh.
Prove it for 2, then un-distribute.
There is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2