The administration is working on a rule change that would deduct the value of a disabled adult’s bedroom from their SSI allotment, even if the family members they live with are poor enough to qualify for food stamps. This would mean slashing the benefits of some of the most low-income SSI recipients by up to a third — about $330 a month in Burton’s case — or ending their support altogether.

The effort to cut SSI for families who also rely on food stamps, also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, was initiated by top White House and Department of Government Efficiency officials last year, multiple Social Security officials said. It marks a second attempt by the Trump administration to quietly but dramatically downsize disability benefit programs overseen by the Social Security Administration, despite those programs’ strict eligibility standards and minimal instances of fraud.

  • MalReynolds@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    A society should be judged upon how they treat their weakest members, the weak, the infirm, the aged and disabled. (Jefferson, but so many others through antiquity, including, very obviously, the Christian church and Jesus, Hell, marriage vows).

    US, how do you think you are judged ??

    Is the marriage of State and Monopoly worth this legacy, on you, and your children’s children?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not in any meaningful way. “We’re not ‘fucking’ you, were just damaging your life severely”

      • username_1@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 days ago

        Still, this current title is misleading and, actually, a straightforward lie. If the government would impose a new tax for disabled, then come back.

        I don’t understand why journalist need to lie in this situation. The situation is bad, it becomes even worse, you don’t need to lie to get people’s attention. But some journalists just can’t refrain from lying.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I don’t understand what’s misleading or false here. If the situation creates new strife for disabled people, it will feel punitive to them. That’s a valid way to describe it. Where’s the lie?