• radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    It should’ve been a retirement account. It would make it solvent forever. Instead it is a system that depends on ever growing population.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      It should have been a proper entitlement instead of worker funded.

      If we fund it through general taxes instead of payroll, you have the wonderful effect where everyone is covered and the program can never go insolvent. When population dynamics result in a generation of retirees bigger than the current workforce you just need to change tax rates or deficit spend.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It already is solvent forever. Every year, it collects money from workers and pays it out to retirees. It can do this forever.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It doesn’t depend on an ever growing population. It depends on a certain percentage of people dying before they collect.