China Reinvigorates Its Taiwan Propaganda through Energy Narratives | Global Taiwan Institute
globaltaiwan.org
China’s long-term objective of achieving “reunification” with Taiwan has been deeply embedded in its foreign policy and external propaganda strategy, and continues to evolve in response to changing global political landscapes. Turbulence in global energy markets triggered by the war in Iran has reinvigorated People’s Republic of China (PRC) propaganda campaigns concerning Taiwan’s energy security. Such narratives have emerged as an influential domain through which China attempts to advance its propaganda campaign and advance its reunification agenda.

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/8555683

Archived version

Energy is fast emerging as a new frontier in China’s cognitive warfare against Taiwan. China has consistently employed a carrot-and-stick strategy: positioning itself as an energy “savior” while simultaneously threatening an energy blockade to pressure Taiwan into yielding to coercion. As such, not only should the Taiwanese government recognize the importance of countering this emerging trend, but regional partners should also prioritize taking collective action to respond to energy-related coercion.

…

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipMEnglish
    1·
    2 days ago

    @randomname@scribe.disroot.org please add the required [Opinion] prefix in the title.

    Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official positions of the authors’ affiliations. The article does not draw on findings from ongoing joint research projects between the authors’ affiliations.

    • randomname@scribe.disroot.orgOPEnglish
      2·
      1 day ago

      Done, although I think this is not an opinion here as the researchers provide strong evidence for this. It’s a good example how the Chinese government is using a blend of false and biased news to fabricate fiction presented as ‘news’ …

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipMEnglish
        3·
        1 day ago

        [Opinion] prefix doesn’t have anything to do with actual content of the article. We just don’t want to attribute something to publications that they do not explicitly endorse.