In this blog post, we explore the ecosystem of open-source forks, revisit the story so far with how Microsoft has been transforming from products to services, go deep into why the Visual Studio Code ecosystem is designed to fracture, and the legal implications of this design then discuss future problems faced by the software development ecosystem if our industry continues as-is on the current path…

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Its MIT open source and anyone can use it!”

    • But the only one Microsoft publishes a not-MIT licensed one
    • And if you DONT use that one, the extension store wont work
    • And even if you make your own extension store (which people did) you legally wont be allowed to use any of the de-facto quality of life extensions (Python, SSH, Docker, C#, C++)
    • And those extensions default to needing fully-closed-source tools develped by microsoft
    • AND anything that tries to build on top of VS Code, (e.g. gitpod; a web-based dev environment) will die because none of the de-facto/core/quality-of-life extensions people are used to will be available. They’ll have to use the Microsoft alternative (e.g. Github workspaces)

    The MIT codebase is just bait

    • eluvatar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think when it becomes a problem it won’t be hard for the community to build their own extensions that can be used anywhere. It doesn’t hurt right now so that work hasn’t been done yet.

      • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Will it ever hurt though? Its designed to make GitPod just feel uncomfortable while making VS Code feels good.