It appears that in every thread about this event there is someone calling everyone else in the thread sick and twisted for not proclaiming that all lives are sacred and being for the death of one individual.

It really is a real life trolley problem because those individuals are not seeing the deaths caused by the insurance industry and not realizing that sitting back and doing nothing (i.e. not pulling the lever on the train track switch) doesn’t save lives…people are going to continue to die if nothing is done.

Taking a moral high ground and stating that all lives matter is still going to costs lives and instead of it being a few CEOs it will be thousands.

  • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    I wasn’t saying that, I was just asking what your solution was. I’ve seen a lot of people complaining about healthcare and going the doomer route that nothing can be changed, everything will always be awful, just shut up, accept it and die.

    So, what’s your suggestions?

    • testfactor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      The issue is you’re telling people not to complain in response to someone saying “randomly murdering United Healthcare workers is ineffective and evil.” It’s an implicit approval of the murder, even while acknowledging that it won’t change anything. It’s a pretty rough look, even if that’s not what you intended.

      But, for suggestions that might work, get involved. Campaign for stricter regulations on the insurance industry. Call your congressional representatives. Run for office and work your way up the system, or become friends with someone who is and help them on their campaign. There’s any number of ways to make a difference that are better than shooting a man in the middle of the street.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        One quibble, this guy wasn’t a worker, he was the boss. The decision maker.

        Have you done any of the items in your second paragraph? If so can you share how it’s gone and what you judge the impact has been?

        • testfactor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Sure, but he’ll be replaced by another boss. Then another. How many should be assassinated?

          I have. I’ve worked on a campaign for my local congressperson (at the time) whos platform I believed in. I met them through the campaign and got to know them personally. They won and are still serving in Congress today, and have done a good job over the years in my opinion (though I’ve since moved states and lost contact).

          It was shockingly easy to get involved. Literally just approached them when they were starting up their campaign and asked to help. I knocked on doors and helped at campaign events, and I like to think that my contributions (and those of people like me) helped to get them elected.

          And, as I say, they were someone that I had the personal cell number of and could contact when I had concerns.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        There’s any number of ways to make a difference that are better than shooting a man in the middle of the street.

        Are they really? How many people have been doing those things for decades with very little to show for it? How much campaigning can a parent paying for cancer treatment for their kid be reasonably expected to do? How many generic responses from representatives not listening to the concerns of their constituents should we trudge through?

        Whether or not this shooter was motivated by the reasons we’re all assuming is pretty irrelevant at this point. The simple fact that we’re having this discussion at this scale demonstrates that people do not believe that the things you mentioned will improve things, and I think that’s a perfectly reasonable interpretation of the situation we find ourselves in. Maybe vigilante action is not the answer but I think it’s pretty clear that the usual responses you’re giving are not resonating with people. Decision makers need to change that perception if they want to prevent people from looking outside the system for answers.

        • testfactor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          First, I think you’re completely underplaying all the huge gains people have made over the years by doing exactly what I’m talking about. Especially at the state and local level.

          But yeah, if you think I’m defending the system as perfect and unflawed, of course not. Of course most people don’t want to have to dedicate their life to fixing the system. Of course they have other priorities. Kids, illness, etc.

          And of course killing a man in cold blood is easier than spending years or decades fighting for the change you want to see.

          But I’ve seen change accomplished by people who believe in the law and civic order. I’ve seen people make the system work. It is possible.

          It’s not easy. It requires someone to basically make it their life, and that’s certainly not for everybody. But it can be done. And if you’re at the point where you’re throwing your life away by shooting a man in the middle of a NYC street, there are better ways to use your life than that.