fredoverflow@alien.topB to Lisp@communick.newsEnglish · 1 year agoThePrimeagen tries to read Clojure code 😅www.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThePrimeagen tries to read Clojure code 😅www.youtube.comfredoverflow@alien.topB to Lisp@communick.newsEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squarelgstein@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoHardly looks like Clojure to me. Might be that Clojure reads and evals it, but thats it.
minus-squarenpafitis@alien.topBlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWhat doesn’t look like clojure to you?
minus-squarelgstein@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoA huge convoluted function that is hard to read. It looks like it was ported over straight from Emacs Lisp or something. I see close to zero utilization of the expressivity of Clojure. Its a terrible example to showcase the language.
minus-squarehunajakettu@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoCould you point to a similar code (easy to understand) written using the expressivity of Clojure? I want to learn better Clojure
Hardly looks like Clojure to me. Might be that Clojure reads and evals it, but thats it.
That’s definitely clojure
Maybe in 2010
What doesn’t look like clojure to you?
A huge convoluted function that is hard to read.
It looks like it was ported over straight from Emacs Lisp or something.
I see close to zero utilization of the expressivity of Clojure. Its a terrible example to showcase the language.
Could you point to a similar code (easy to understand) written using the expressivity of Clojure?
I want to learn better Clojure