• SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For almost all users, especially beginners, nano is just simpler faster and better. A lot of distributions are bundling it, and I am finding indeed systems without vim at all.

      • Neil@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been using nano for 10+ years. Found micro and it is superior. Had to alias nano so that it opens micro instead, though. Hard to break such habits.

          • Neil@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I could see that if you’re more skilled at something like vim.

            • burgersc12@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ok i think i overeacted. I couldn’t figure out how to exit it, so i assumed it was like vim. Needed to exit Termux manually (which i hate) but the ctrl+s & q is easy. Will consider it another option to remember like moving from cat to bat

              • Neil@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah, gotcha. Yeah the keybindings are very sensible especially for people coming from Windows. I do think it’s better than Nano for newcomers.

      • CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m surprised there aren’t more distros that come packaged with it. If someone’s used a graphical text editor in the past decade, then they know how to use micro. The only distro I know of that has it by default is Garuda.