• Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wrong. Again, my goal is to solve climate change. You’re making shit up about why this is happening.

      Like I said, you no longer have to lie to yourself about the limitations of BEV. An FCEV refuels in 5 minutes, solving this problem completely. Unless you think I’m making this up, then you are the one projecting here.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your goal is to solve climate change then why are you spending all this energy bickering about how you think hydrogen cars are better than EVs? Everyone driving a hydrogen car isn’t going to solve climate change.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          By itself, no. But you can power basically anything with hydrogen. Pretty much all of industry will switch to hydrogen. Same is true of most of transportation. It’s just the BEV fanatic crowd that suddenly has an issue with passenger cars also being powered by hydrogen. In reality, it is a big revolution across many sectors. That will in fact solve climate change or at least greatly reduce the problem.

          • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Guess what, bud, you can power basically anything with electricity too. Electricity even powers hydrogen vehicles!

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Actually no. You actually need a chemical fuel in a lot of cases.

              A hydrogen car is basically an EV but with a vastly more energy dense battery. Hence why it is a better idea than a BEV.