• spongebue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    It can be called slavery while still being permissible under the constitution. It’s not illegal slavery, just like pre-civil war slavery in the south wasn’t illegal… But it’s still slavery.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Slaves have owners, but call it flapjacks or pudding or whatever makes you feel like a keyboard justice warrior.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        If “has an owner” is what everything hinges on, and the Department of Corrections or whoever has full custody and control doesn’t count, fine. I guess that’s technically in the first definition that came up. But Jesus Christ, when the vast majority of conditions match up, you sure spent a hell of a lot more time puffing your chest and acting high and mighty instead of, you know, explaining why it isn’t. You had to go through a few responses before any explanation at all!

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes, having an owner is what the word itself hinges on. The imagery and emotion that go with it aren’t a handy colorful Post-It to stick on something else.