I see a lot of posts lately, mainly in ‘world news’ communities, that when I investigate their source, I cannot come to any other conclostion that purposefully spreading of fake news and propaganda on lemmy.

I love this platform and want to see it thrive, but the fact that these kind of posts can so easily populate my feed is disturbing.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope that you’re not specifically talking about Israel Palestine because if so that particular issue has so many different people with very strong wildly divergent views that simply trying to define what “fake news is would be a political decision”.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reports from war zones will always be highly suspect, because the belligerents have agendas and third parties don’t really have access to provide objective independent accountability.

    I don’t think there is a way to both have access to war zone reporting, and hold to a objective standard of truth. So the organic propaganda and the astroturfing is just part of modern warfare.

    You could run a news community with reporting standards, and moderate away unverified data. But the people with more ‘timely’ and ‘sensational’ reporting will get the eye-balls anyway, so you have to educate people on why getting verification is worth it… kinda like how the economist is slow to report, but has lots of depth.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The new twist is we can see the efforts from both sides, historically we would only enjoy the propaganda of one side at a time until the war was over.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    First, you should acknowledge that all sources are biased to a certain degree, some more than others. Any source that claim to always be “Fair and Balanced” like Fox News is usually anything but. When looking at a news article you should always ask yourself these questions:

    1. What idea/agenda is the author/source trying to express?
    2. Who benefits (monetarily or otherwise) from the expression of this idea?
    3. Based on what you know, are there any contradictions in these ideas? (ESPECIALLY self-contradictions.)

    Source reliability is only a small part of the equation as appeal to authority is usually overvalued:if Fox News says the Earth revolves around the Sun, that statement doesn’t suddenly become false. To determine the veracity of an article is simple, but not easy: you can only derive the truth from hard facts. You should look at the primary source and evidences and ask yourself:

    1. Are there any hard verificable evidence such as photos, videos, or other direct documentations?
    2. Are there only unverifiable, anecdotal, and/or circumstantial claims and evidences for this?
    3. What’s the original source from which the claims were made?

    This should give you a good framework of spotting fake news.

  • Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Make a comment with your conclusion and how you arrived at it.

    If applicable, report the post.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, and you might get clowned on in the comments, fairly or unfairly, but all you can do in any media aggregate forum is fact check and try to debunk.

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oha. Can you name a few examples? I browse world news quite often and am kinda worried right now.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Defederate from the tankie instances (including .ml). This Israel thing has really show not only how willing these places are to do straight up information warfare, but also how they’ve amplified an extremely chilling and alarmingly violent minority.

  • Post fact-checks (links a bonus) in the comments, which are few enough to scroll and check. That’s where I look for paywall bypasses, TLDRs and will post a screed for additional context if I have opinions that everyone should know.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you see hate-inciting posts, wilful disinformation or egregious misinformation, then be sure to use the report button.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Find new communities when that happens, or bring it up with the admins so those mods are replaced

  • Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t follow news feeds on any social platforms including lemmy. Find a reliable source. These billion dollar platforms like Facebook can’t moderate every fake news, lemmy has no chance.

    • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that they can’t, it’s that they don’t have a need to. Enticing news, fake or otherwise, keeps people engaged, commenting, posting, starting flame wars, and they do all of it on the platform. Somebody at some point noticed that users don’t mind fake news (as in they don’t leave the platform as long as there is fake news posted there), and the potential ‘hit’ to reputation is well balanced by the boost in engagement they see.

      Lemmy, on the other hand, might not have the same incentive (yet?) to keep spreading bullshit for the sake of getting firemen and arsonists locked in a neverending game.