For the next three years, Google must meet the following criteria:

  • Allow third-party app stores for Android, and let those app stores distribute all the same apps as are available in Google Play (app developers can opt out of this);
  • Distribute third-party app stores as apps, so users can switch app stores by downloading a new one from Google Play, in just the same way as they’d install any app;
  • Allow apps to use any payment processor, not just Google’s 30 percent money-printing machine;
  • Permit app vendors to tell users about other ways to pay for the things they buy in-app;
  • Permit app vendors to set their own prices.

Google is also prohibited from using its cash to fence out rivals, for example, by:

  • Offering incentives to app vendors to launch first on Google Play, or to be exclusive to Google Play;
  • Offering incentives to app vendors to avoid rival app stores;
  • Offering incentives to hardware makers to pre-install Google Play;
  • Offering incentives to hardware makers not to install rival app stores.
  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    … why are you boldly speculating on OP’s language status? That’s pulled directly from the article

    Checked other sources, the restriction is only in place for three years.

    • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      Because I was obviously unaware of the idiocy of the US justice system, and naively gave them the benefit of the doubt.

      Under normal circumstances, it’d take Google about 3 years to stall the process of opening.

      This will achieve nothing, and it would’ve been better for US consumers if my bold assumption had been correct.