• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I don’t care what you do, I am talking about the hypocrisy in your statements.

    You did it again here, both saying you don’t give a shit but also are committed to supporting animal rights.

    You started this by blaming vegans for reducing interest in animal rights, surely a projection of how you feel onto society. Thats your excuse for not learning more about veganism or trying it out. You already know enough right?

    Go ahead and explain how you sending money to groups trying to convince slaughterhouses to use humane methods is helping?

    What does help is that veganism is simply about reducing harm, and that it tends to have benefits for personal health, environment, and for animals.

    But you can stick with your “if only we murdered them more politely things would be fine” line and see how much that helps.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        Factory farms won’t get better until demand reduces.

        Got any great ideas to make factory farms more humane that won’t slow down production of meat? Is the demand going up or down over time?

        Of course the answer can’t be reducing meat consumption in general, right? Dont have to be vegan to eat less meat do you now?

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Factory farms won’t get better until demand reduces

          I don’t believe you have any proof of this. there is no mechanism by which reducing demand would improve factory farms.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            Why do factory farms use outdated slaughter techniques in the first place? Production quantity comes first. They will not reduce their capacity to produce meat just to make the animals lives better.

            Where’s the evidence that your idea is any better than mine anyways?

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              Where’s the evidence that your idea is any better than mine anyways?

              i didn’t present any other idea. i said you don’t have any evidence your idea holds water.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 days ago

                I can’t predict the future if thats what you mean.

                Theres plenty of evidence that reducing meat production where possible will help everyone. Theres plenty of evidence that at least a mostly plant based diet is better for personal health for most people.

                Less animals suffering is a plus too but you could leave it out and still come to the conclusion that there is something behind plant based and partially plant based diets.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  27 days ago

                  Less animals suffering is a plus too but you could leave it out and still come to the conclusion that there is something behind plant based and partially plant based diets.

                  this is a nonsequitur. my guess is you have tried plant based diet, and the amount of animal slaughter has only increased: chart

                  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    27 days ago

                    We’ve had this argument like twice already.

                    I never claimed that me being a vegan would end animal suffering.

                    If you would admit that the line on your graph would go up quicker if all vegetarians and vegans went back to eating meat, then you have to also admit it would go up slower if more people went vegan, vegetarian, or simply ate 25% less meat than they normally do.

                    You must be able to see the math there? Do I need to send you university debate level arguments? I can find them for you if you want.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Theres plenty of evidence that reducing meat production where possible will help everyone.

                  this is a different claim than you made before

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          You can literally enforce better conditions in farms, making factory farming practices illegal, and it’s possible we could’ve had the support required to make it happen.

          If you amend your messaging and behavior even a little bit, it might still be possible.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            How would we do that without dramatically reducing the amount of meat being produced?

            As for the support, it sounds like you are blaming vegans for factory farmers actions. If they want to do things more humanely they are free to do it.

            Its a waste of time in my opinion, and its hypocritical to be an animal activist who eats animals.

            We can have a conversation about the ethical slaughterhouse in your mind but I guarantee you we will not agree on what is ethical treatment of an animal if thats the case.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              How would we do that without dramatically reducing the amount of meat being produced?

              maybe you can’t, but it seems like you think that would be a good outcome.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  i didn’t say there is anything wrong with it. and if their plan (increased welfare standards) leads to that, i would think you would support it.

                  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    27 days ago

                    Well, one plan involves convincing western politicians and the companies that pay for them, to self regulate. The other involves personal choice.

                    So I guess I chose the easy one.

                    Also vegans do participate in animal activism of course. They just won’t argue for better ways to slaughter animals.

            • Comment105@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              …it sounds like you are blaming vegans for factory farmers actions.

              You’re refusing to get this point right: I’m blaming vegans for public disinterest, which indirectly allows the factories to completely maximize profits by squeezing the animals they use.


              Its a waste of time in my opinion…

              I know you think that. You’re vegan.

              You don’t care about the pig in the pen any more than you care about the prey in the field. What bothers you is that there are carnivores on your block. A cow could be tortured and slaughtered at 5, or live comfortably in a large field and die of natural causes, it makes no difference to you. You’re bothered by the steak on the plate. That’s your fight.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                27 days ago

                First of all, plenty of vegans are activists, doing the stuff you are talking about. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

                The problem is people wanting to be animal rights activists but giving no moral consideration to animals and doing absurdly hypocritical things like contributing to the system they stand in opposition of.

                Apparently you just want to be able to eat guilt free meat? Seems to be what you accomplish with your “framework” of being anti vegan, anti factory farm, but pro eating meat.