The March 14 directive, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections.

According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval. Instead, immigration officers can sign their own administrative warrants. The bar for action is low — a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fun Fact: In Indiana, you can legally convert ICE agents into a fine red mist if they try this.

    They have no legal protections while breaking the law.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Problem is… It then gets reduced to you shooting at people, and people shooting at you. That’s seems like lose lose situation.

  • thorhop@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Listen, your family migrated here like a 100 years ago from Europe… so we’ll just assume you’re Tren de Aragua. What? No, this has nothing to do with you being an intellectual or a lefty. Now get in the concentration ca-I mean; the extralegal detention centre… yes, that’s it.

  • danarchyintheATL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Reminder that many states have “STAND YOUR GROUND” laws that include protecting you in the event you shoot someone claiming to be a federal agent who doesn’t produce badges or a warrant.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is a blatant violation of the 4th Amendment, and they are counting on the Supreme Court to back then, which they won’t. Then they’ll just ignore the Supreme Court, and do it anyway.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Agree. They need to be extremely afraid of us. Politicians are greedy cowards, and they only respond to money and fear. We don’t have money to bribe them like the Sociopathic Oligarchs, so we have to make their fear of us overwhelm their greed.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Enter my home without a warrant or identifying yourself, and your gonna leave in a casket.

    I’ve also explained to my family that we do not open the door to anyone, especially people who claim to be cops. Way too easy to claim it, then force their way in while your waiting for them to prove who they are.

    • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m white and would also like to know. I assume it would be a decision made by the local group on a case by case basis.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Right fucking here. Notice they’re picking on people highly unlikely to fight back? Come for my brown, legal-migrant wife, see what happens.

      • naught@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        You’re going to get into a firefight with federal cops with your wife around? Genuinely asking what the “find out” part is

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes, I’m prepared to die. And that isn’t a knee-jerk macho reaction. I’ve put a great deal of thought into this.

          Look, it’s easy for me to say, a middle-aged man who has lived life. Been a few times where I thought, “Shit, this may be it. Can’t say I have many regrets and this day is as fine as another other.” I understand that younger folks want to play out the odds, I would have felt the same in my 20s or 30s, maybe into my 40s.

          But at some point you have to draw a moral line in the sand. Literally say, “I’ll die before I allow this.” I will not allow unidentified, warrantless, masked men into my home to kidnap my (legal alien) wife. I see no benefit in going quietly. After all, American cops have taught us by example, if they kick the door in, they are there to kill you. It’s the orge’s choice, die fast or slow. Begging and pleading only gets you killed slower.

        • Yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          What’s the alternative? Stay silent and let her disappear to the El Salvador death camp? Take a few of them with you.

          • naught@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Im willing to bet the odds she’ll die at the death camp are lower than in a close quarters gunfight with a bunch of dumbfucks firing away.

            Feel free to go out in an unnecessary blaze of glory though. Very macho 👌

            I’d do my best to make sure I could see my wife again

  • Owl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Considering ICE likes to abduct people in masks, civilian clothing and without any identification and thus are easily confused with burglars, i’d say shoot on sight for trespassing would be a viable option.

  • nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Well, constitutionally, they can’t for whatever that’s worth now.

    That bold faced liar can go right to hell.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Doesn’t seem like it really matters if the courts rule against it. The judicial branch has no enforcement mechanism, and no one seems to be willing to escalate.

      • Necroscope0@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yes they do. The US Marshall service is considered the judicial armed police force. Though at the moment they enforce immigration as one of their functions they would be the ones to arrest federal cops for doing unconstitutional (illegal) shit in theory.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Unfortunately wrong. The marshals work for Pam Bondi at the DOJ. Still under the control of the executive.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Looking forward to this being challenged in a state with Stand Your Ground laws where warrantless trespassing is legally the same as any other trespassing.

      I’m personally opposed to lethal force being used to protect property in general, but there are places where that is essentially legal due to Stand Your Ground laws.

      • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Your opposed to it, but now you also see the sole reason the 2nd exists. If ever the government does something like warrantless trespassing, it’s our civic duty to use our 2nd amendment rights to remind them we oppose tyranny. That said, never thought this would happen in our lifetimes. Worlds a changing.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          There are very few people who would survive this tactic though.

          Still seems like a stupid plan—2nd amendment or not (which is really not what the 2nd was about before courts made it anyway). At best you take one with you on the way out, if you’re ready when they break in. At this point I’d still rather be detained than dead.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              ^ This, 100%

              Some of us don’t have the luxury to keep our heads down and blend in when fascists want to target those who are “different.” That’s why I am outspoken about it - I can’t hide who I am, and even if I could, I’d refuse to live a lie.

              I don’t have kids, I don’t have pets, the only person depending on my survival is me. If fascists come to take me, I’d rather go down and take them with me than go into the black hole (an entity from which nothing escapes) of a foreign prison/death camp.

              To assume one will merely be “detained” and given due process in the United States is, sadly, a naïve take in 2025.

          • arrow74@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            If everyone they illegally targeted managed to take one this problem would be quickly resolved

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    In California remember you have Castle Doctrine. Protecting yourself, your home, and property from unwarranted unannounced invasions from ANYONE allows you to use deadly force if available

    • Mike D.@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Wait. CA allows the Castle Doctrine?

      A quick search shows it does. I’ll be damned.

      • Clearwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ll be damned as well.

        Worth noting for any Californians that it u-turns if the person stops being a threat. If you threaten and they run away, you’re now in the wrong if you shoot.

  • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Any law, rule or regulation that violates the constitution is invalid. The Supreme Court has ruled on this in multiple cases. Unless Congress passes a constitutional amendment that eliminates the 4th amendment, the executive branch must abide by the law as it’s written. The executive branch has no authority to make, change or interpret law.

    Edit: A lot of laws and constitutional amendments have been made since the 1798 Alien Enemies Act was passed. The 13th Amendment banned slavery (with a loophole) The 14th Amendment gave equal protection under the law among other things. The 1964 Civil Rights Act made it a crime to discriminate based on race and national origin, which pretty much destroys the Alien Enemies Act. No altering the enforcement of our laws based on where the person came from or what they look like.