I started to notice that more sites are turning into paywalls, and I don’t like that and would prefer ads over subscriptions.

I am curious, what does the general community think about that?

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You realize that if newspapers offered a federated service (pay once, you get them all), they’d make money hand over fist?

    But noooo…each newspaper wants you to pay.

    I’d pay upwards of $20 a month if that guaranteed me access to the major newspapers (NYT, WaPo, LA Times, etc.) and my local one with one subscription.

    • undefined@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I do this with Apple News. Not sure if anything like it exists, but what worries me is Apple cut their News development staff recently which makes me think people (at least Apple users) don’t value journalism enough to support it.

      • pyrflie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        They do, I use it, and it’s local. National/international could have something similar, but don’t.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m not saying it’s a bad idea but it’s interesting how similar that is to cable TV.

      Of course, cable TV was largely ad-free at first then you ended up paying for it and getting ads.