• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m just sick of the fucking tankies telling me World War 3 will finally give us workers rights.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I don’t think there are real communists honestly. I don’t think communism is ever really a “viable” solution unless you suppress freedoms. Also someone will always rise to the top. Communism is just one big corporation that you can not leave.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            At the risk of starting another argument, I have heard it described thusly—

            Suppose you have some number of apples and some number of people who want the apples.

            • Capitalism is where one person owns all the apples and everyone has to work for them to get an apple.
            • Socialism is where the apples are distributed evenly to all the people who want them.
            • Communism is where unlimited apples fall out of the sky and everyone can have as many as they need.

            Now, this quote was originally used by capitalists to mock communism, but I think it’s really not a bad analogy. Think about it: Star Trek, another beloved Lemmy staple, takes place in a communist society. Everyone works whatever job they want contributing to society and in return, everyone gets whatever they need provided for by the state. It’s not truly post scarcity, since human greed always outstrips any finite amount of resources. But there is no distinction of rich or poor in Star Trek. People are judged by their intelligence, skill, and merit, and rewarded proportionally. At the same time, there is no concept of money, mostly (except when the plot needs it). What good is money when all your necessities are taken care of? All but your wildest desires can be conjured up at a snap of your fingers, and all the state asks in return is that you do what you can to contribute. It is a mutually beneficial relationship that most people have learned to be content with. That, my friends, is an ideal depiction of communism.

            • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago
              • Capitalism is where one person owns all the copies of Tommy Wiseau’s The Room
              • Socialism is where the copies of Tommy Wiseau’s The Room are distributed evenly to all the people who want them
              • Communism is where a transgender furry breaks the DRM on the DVD and publishes a torrent of Tommy Wiseau’s The Room
            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think the Star Trek ideal is not viable in the least as people will always be self centered. They will either seek either to make there own lives better or to make there families lives better. Also Star Trek changes its narrative depending on the movie or series.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think a public production and distribution of goods can be handled democratically which will eventually happen organically with a strong and adaptable democracy, furthermore I agree any other form of Communism such as the CCP is just malarkey.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, the Phillippines, Crimea, and Ukraine (just to name some ongoing conflicts)

            But sure, its all the west with their “mutual defence pacts” and their “incentivizing diplomacy through trade”, Those beligerent bastards.

            Also, though, whataboutism in the face of their dogshit ideology.

      • WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I mean that’s why they are called tankies :P It’s a derogatory word originally used to describe “socialists” defending tanks being sent into ukraine by the soviet union, and then was quickly used to describe all “socialists” defending genocide, imperialism, and authoritarianism.