• erenkoylu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Internet was fine in the early 2000s before the rise of social media platforms resulted in surveillance advertisement complex.

    It was a different place, but worked ok.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Sounds like you’re forgetting about the dot com bubble. The internet wasn’t fine abck then because nobody really had a sustainable business model.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The dot com bubble made the Internet explode, sure, but corporate sites weren’t the entire internet back then. There were far more niche sites, web rings, forums, etc…

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The reason I mentioned the dot com bubble is because a lot of the companies back then failed because they couldn’t figure out a sustainable business model. It was mostly hype-driven with the idea of getting users first, then figuring out monetization later.

          That’s why we have ad-supported sites today. It was the main business model that was the most sustainable.

          There were a lot of small sites, sure, but a lot of them were hosted on services with no real business model. Even back then, not a lot of people self-hosted.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Surveillance advertisement was already around.

      Social Media platforms simply capitalized on it.

      And users sucked it up for “convenience”.