• Thorry@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    How am I supposed to interpret these numbers? What does the number on the left signify?

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      People simultaneously think AI will lower the amount of jobs available and that there are too few workers. It makes no sense

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      And less jobs offer pensions and the pensioners are starting to die off as baby boomers hit their last years.

      • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is true, but it actually wouldn’t really address this problem at all.

        The issue here is production vs consumption is out of whack. Taking money from billionaires and pumping it into the consumption side doesn’t fix the imbalance. There would still be the same amount of production and the consumers would now have more money to buy the same amount of things, so the prices of stuff would just go up (or the value of money would go down, depends on how you want to look at it). So you would just create inflation with the type of wealth transfer you implied.

        The trick is to take the billionaires money and put it to use producing things, not consuming things. There are tons of ways to do this such as investing in education, small business loans, scientific grants, and big infrastructure projects.

        Another solution is to increase immigration to make up the production imbalance. Good luck getting that through todays political climate, but most economists would agree it would help alleviate the problem OP referenced.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          The trick is to take the billionaires money and put it to use producing things, not consuming things. There are tons of ways to do this such as investing in education, small business loans, scientific grants, and big infrastructure projects. Absolutely! China has made great strides in tying production to actual needs.

          Another solution is to increase immigration to make up the production imbalance. Good luck getting that through todays political climate, but most economists would agree it would help alleviate the problem OP referenced.

          A healthy immigrant policy can compliment a healthy production policy.