cm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 29 days agoJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlimagemessage-square119linkfedilinkarrow-up1889arrow-down121cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1868arrow-down1imageJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlcm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 29 days agomessage-square119linkfedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squareGiveOver@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·29 days agoBut how do we define a “chicken egg”? Is it an egg containing a chicken, or an egg that’s been laid by a chicken?
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·28 days agoGood point. Now I’m less sure. I guess any “egg containing a chicken” came first, by definition. I don’t think I would accept anything that didn’t come from an egg as my canonical first chicken, anyway.
But how do we define a “chicken egg”? Is it an egg containing a chicken, or an egg that’s been laid by a chicken?
Good point. Now I’m less sure.
I guess any “egg containing a chicken” came first, by definition. I don’t think I would accept anything that didn’t come from an egg as my canonical first chicken, anyway.