• RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, holy shit, that headline is hard to parse with the “maintenance of restrictions on enforcement of bans.”

  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    american law confuses me.
    It is a good thing the shitty law doesn’t get enforced, but it’s so strange to me how a judge can just ban enforcement of a law. Is it. Even a law then

    • perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Laws can’t conflict with the US Constitution, so if a law says that people with certain clothes aren’t allowed to speak, then the judge can say that’s not a real law.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the freedom of speech thing people seem to hate. Drag is a form of art and expression so there’s a massive hurdle in trying to ban it. If they can’t make it over the hurdle of the first amendment it is unenforceable as a law.

      There are still sodomy laws on the books in some states that are entirely useless.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The party concerned about freedom is really concerned about controlling what people wear.