• jdeath@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Neil Harbisson is the world’s first officially recognised human cyborg

    fucking bullshit. stephen hawking couldn’t function or communicate without his chair & computer. you’re gonna say that doesn’t count? then i don’t trust your judgement

    • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know somebody who has implated hearing aids. If they’re not a cyborg, I don’t know who is.

      • jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        hernia mesh brother! that’s a great idea, I’m stealing it! my man

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think generally, assistive devices like Hawking’s wheelchair/speech synth wouldn’t qualify one for the title of “cyborg”, since they’re replacing lost/damaged functionality, and didn’t grant him any abilities not already available to the average person. Whereas Harbisson’s modification is giving him additional abilities that he didn’t previously have and are outside of the typical human experience.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Replacing lost functionality is also acceptable for a cyborg, but Hawkings simply didn’t replace any organic part of himself, he used external devices. Someone with cochlear implants or a total artificial heart totally should count as a cyborg though - they have integrated mechanical body parts (well, both are partly external I guess…)
        But it doesn’t really make sense that just because this version of a hearing implant doesn’t give you better than normal hearing, having an identical device that did would be the difference between being a cyborg or not.