• Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’ll stick with the theory an innocent death is for the the greater good until it’s your innocent death.

    You could make the same argument that someone without insurance or means should be denied access because the hospital needs only paying customers to stay in business.

    Some people would find that to be amoral.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’ll stick with the theory an innocent death is for the the greater good until it’s your innocent death.

      I never said the death was for good. Nor have I said that it’d be immoral for a doctor to break the law. The death is because of a horrible legal reality and a doctor that complies with the law isn’t some sort of monster. There are justifications for that decision, but you won’t respect them. I am not some moral absolutist like you appear to be. Things can be murky.

      You could make the same argument that someone without insurance or means should be denied access because the hospital needs only paying customers to stay in business.

      I could, but I’m not making that argument. In fact, I argue strongly that the entire healthcare industry should be nationalized and paid by taxes. Just because that’s my desired outcome doesn’t mean that I turn around and shame doctors and nurses for working for more than minimum wage. Which is effectively what you are saying “These doctors are making healthcare expensive for all because of their salaries. They should work for free!”

      In the exact same vein, I argue that abortion should be legal and highly available. But that’s not the environment I or doctors find themselves in. So, sorry, I’m not going to fault doctors for not playing hero.