floofloof@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agoTop Democrats re-introduce trans bill of rightswww.washingtonblade.comexternal-linkmessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down17cross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1305arrow-down1external-linkTop Democrats re-introduce trans bill of rightswww.washingtonblade.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square69linkfedilinkcross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareWoodScientist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 days agoSure. History has proven that civil rights laws that are very specific and explicit are much more resilient to legal challenge than broad ones. They probably should have been a hell of a lot more specific in the Reconstruction amendments.
Sure. History has proven that civil rights laws that are very specific and explicit are much more resilient to legal challenge than broad ones. They probably should have been a hell of a lot more specific in the Reconstruction amendments.