• w2tpmf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well the very first and most important thing they wanted was to give you the right to say that or whatever you want about them.

    Before they enshrined that concept in their document, saying such things about members of your government would get you jailed or executed.

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sounds like it was useful. Now it seems like it just differentiates us from countries that can do something about the spread of hate.

      Not against the Constitution, but the Freedom of Speech **is **perhaps the most anachronistic freedom if you look at much of Europe.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like it was useful.

        It still is? Unless you think someone should be able to go to jail for making a joke about a government official.

        Not against the Constitution, but the Freedom of Speech **is **perhaps the most anachronistic freedom if you look at much of Europe.

        Yeah you say that when a party you support is in power.