Three hundred and sixty-five days after Donald Trump placed his hand on the Bible and completed an extraordinary return to power, many historians, scholars and experts say his presidency has pushed American democracy to the brink – or beyond it.

In the first year of Trump’s second term, the democratically elected US president has moved with startling speed to consolidate authority: dismantling federal agencies, purging the civil service, firing independent watchdogs, sidelining Congress, challenging judicial rulings, deploying federal force in blue cities, stifling dissent, persecuting political enemies, targeting immigrants, scapegoating marginalized groups, ordering the capture of a foreign leader, leveraging the presidency for profit, trampling academic freedom and escalating attacks on the news media.

The scale and velocity of what he has been able to accomplish in just a year have stunned even longtime observers of authoritarian regimes, pushing the debate among academics and Americans from whether the world’s oldest continuous democracy is backsliding to whether it can still faithfully claim that distinction.

“In 2025, the United States ceased to be a full democracy in the way that Canada, Germany or even Argentina are democracies,” Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, the prominent Harvard political scientists and authors of How Democracies Die, and the University of Toronto professor Lucan Way, wrote in Foreign Affairs last month. They argued that the US under Trump had “descended into competitive authoritarianism”, a system in which elections are held but the ruling party abuses power to stifle dissent and tilt the playing field in its favor.

  • Soulg@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    You can make the arguments about it targeting 1ueer people, and they seem pretty decent, but he is TEXT BOOK malignant narcissist. It’s not even close or funny that it is that identical

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The list of diagnostic criteria isn’t the only thing to consider. The disorder must also harm or impair the patient, that’s what makes it a disorder. The psychologist who wrote the diagnostic criteria has gone on record to say Trump doesn’t have the disorder, because he’s not suffering and he’s not disabled. For him, it isn’t a disorder. So he doesn’t have the disorder.

      Think about it, we don’t diagnose a worm with Deafness or blindness, because it’s a worm, it doesn’t care. There’s no medical utility to that diagnosis. Trump is like a worm: he doesn’t need empathy or humility, so lacking those things isn’t a disorder. Therapy wouldn’t help him.