• NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Google, Amazon and Facebook aren’t dogs that sniff you through your phone? Stop spreading this nonsense.

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is it any better that their profiling is so accurate they can “appear like doing this” by just knowing what devices spend time near us?

      • GiveOver@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes. Phones not snooping 24/7 with a microphone is better than phones snooping 24/7 with a microphone. What kind of question is this? If you get people used to the idea that phones are always recording, people won’t be as offended when these dickhead companies actually start doing it.

    • Ziglin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Google listens in to recognize what music playing (default on Google Pixels) this can’t be done locally without a huge database so in way or another Google is sending processed microphone data to their servers. There’s no way they can resist getting their grubby mits on that ad data…

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The database of fingerprints is actually quite small and stored locally. You could have looked this up in less time than it took you to spout bullshit.

        • Ziglin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I counted this out based on the number of obscure songs I had seen, making me think it would have to be gigabytes of names alone. This still doesn’t stop Google from sending this to their servers as long as it has network permissions.

        • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Who the fuck said anything about fingerprints, literal or figurative. There’s absolutely no way that a database of every song ever recorded is stored on an Android phone. Wake up.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        this can’t be done locally without a huge database

        Good thing Pixel’s have a built in database of “fingerprints” of popular songs for local processing.

        • Ziglin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I did not know this, it seemed way too good for that, I might have to retract some previous statements. Though I also don’t know how to verify that it doesn’t use the network as I don’t think it is available outside the default android that comes preinstalled.