• Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    A typewritten document from who the fuck knows when is not.

    The fact it’s not a recording doesn’t make it not firsthand testimony, and neither does its age (which is from 2020 btw, you can see it yourself at the top of the document).

    Firsthand testimony isn’t inherently true, but that doesn’t make it not firsthand testimony.

    It sure as shit isn’t hearsay as was being asserted.

    • neatchee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      but it’s not first-hand testimony. it’s a typewritten document by an FBI agent. that is literally not first-hand testimony. in order to be first-hand testimony it needs to be given in a courtroom or recorded. we don’t even know if the person who made the phone call is who they claim to be.