That’s separate issue. Loopholes suck, and aren’t fixed due to political corruption.
But by problem is that he tried to claim that billionaires paid 91%, in the 60s which is just provably false - I can’t take an article with such a blatant lie seriously. At best it means he has no idea how the tax system works, at worst it’s pure malice
That’s separate issue. Loopholes suck, and aren’t fixed due to political corruption.
But by problem is that he tried to claim that billionaires paid 91%, in the 60s which is just provably false - I can’t take an article with such a blatant lie seriously. At best it means he has no idea how the tax system works, at worst it’s pure malice
In other words, the headline is deceptive. A big no-no in journalism.