• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Maybe i left out too much context.

    Im not talking about the research itself, but about how it could be utilized.

    Their idea (having small devices that can be powered by nothing but stray radiowaves) apparently works and is great by itself.

    However its usefullness is limited if you cant somehow connect those devices with the rest of the world. Thats the issue im complaining about.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are tons of small devices that don’t have to be connected to be useful. Lots of personal items or small sensors.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are already lots of concepts for low power wireless communication for example LoRaWAN The issue is not the ISP its the technology used to establish a connection between devices. We need hardware that can run with the low power requirements that come with this research.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That’s not any sort of legal issue stopping you, that’s physics. If you’re trying to create say, some sort of mesh network, and the device is using all of the signal’s power just to run itself, there’s no power left to retransmit. You don’t get something from nothing. We’re talking microamps and smaller with these devices.

          If you’ve ever used a crystal radio, you can get an idea for how weakly powered stuff like this is.

          Edit: look up the channel “EEVBlog” on YouTube, dude has a dozen videos on various such devices and goes into the actual math and viability of each.