• jimbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. The amount paid for dues is greatly exceeded by the benefits of having a union.

    2. You ARE guaranteed pay, benefits, and rules because you have a contract with the employer that covers those things.

    3. Are these morons suggesting that the union will take over for management?

    • Kimano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      No the usual ‘argument’ that references is that it you have a complaint or preference or comment or whatever about your work or job duties, you have to bring it to your union rep, rather than talk directly with your employers management. Somehow that’s supposed to be an argument against unions.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are these morons suggesting that the union will take over for management?

      Some unions make disciplinary processes and who can be terminated under what conditions part of the contract. In the worst cases this creates a scenario where bad workers are functionally impossible to fire and the people there actually trying to get their work done have to deal with it, because the bad apple hasn’t been written up for identical violations on at least 3 different dates in the last 90 days, then been provided with explicit written directions of how not to do what they’ve been doing in a meeting with management and the union rep, then given another month before reevaluating if they’ve corrected the issue, then suspending them if they haven’t, then doing the whole process over again before being allowed to fire them. Passing the improvement plan evaluation resets the whole thing. Presuming what they’re doing isn’t an immediate risk of injury or death, that is (that has an expedited process).

  • Chunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boss: kids your age are so incredibly arrogant. You think you deserve the world.

    Me: we are the same age.

    Boss: huh

    This actually happened.

    • ÜberKiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      People really out here thinking that if you’re a supervisor you just get like 20 years older lmao

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    They make union dues seem like a big deal, but not unionizing will cost you even more. A union will pay for itself when they negotiate a raise.

    You have much fewer guarantees on pay, benefits, and work rules without a union on your side. Amazon can, and does, change policies at will. A union keeps them in check.

    Bringing complaints directly to your supervisor or manager will solve nothing, and in the process, it will get you on their shit list. Sometimes, anonymity is priceless.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have much fewer guarantees on pay, benefits, and work rules without a union on your side.

      I disagree. Without a union, I CAN GUARANTEE you’re getting screwed.

    • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m very pro union. But not all unions are good. My father’s union is so bad he might actually be losing money. They just roll over for management to fuck them, barely negotiate anything at all. Last time, they ‘negotiated’ an increase in pay, and the increase was actually SMALLER than the increase in union dues.

      Oh, and they only defend the worst of the worst. Litteral thief, stealing, caught on camera, multiple times ? Well defend you tooth and nails. 'Til the management litterally had to get police involved for them to back down.

      Unions in general are good. But for some specific unions, ymmv.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        100% agree. Some of my “favorites” are police unions, when they go to bat for obvious criminals. You or I would go to jail under the same circumstances, but those assholes don’t even get a reprimand, and still have authority over others.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unions are meant to protect the people from overpowered companies. The police union instead protects an overpowered force against the will of the people.

          The police unions are absolutely antithetical to the idea of unions as a whole

          • magnetosphere@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good point. I made the mistake of thinking that because “union” is in the name, it’s the same thing. It most definitely is not.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, and they only defend the worst of the worst.

        Naw, more likely people only hear about the most dramatic examples. The every-day, my boss is picking on me stuff rarely gets much attention and is generally resolved quietly.  

        Litteral thief, stealing, caught on camera, multiple times ? Well defend you tooth and nails. 'Til the management litterally had to get police involved for them to back down.

        The severity of the accusation shouldn’t disqualify someone from their union defending them. Also, for a criminal matter, why didn’t they go the police to begin with?

        • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When it’s a low amount in theft, it’s more trouble involving police than just letting them go. It’s also on their record, barring them for future job and putting in legal problem

          So it’s better for everyone involved. Unless union want to literally defend a thief

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not all anything is good. That’s not how real life works. There’s only statistics. And statistically speaking, unions are the better choice.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s because too many union members treat their union like a service being provided to them instead of something they’re providing for themselves. A union is what the members make it, and if people aren’t participating then yeah, it will probably suck.

      • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Costco is (afaik) not unionized, though the company is union friendly (there may be unionized stores?). They are publicly traded. And workers are paid better than a living wage and have a bunch of benefits.

        The company chooses to do this despite their shareholder responsibility, and I will never shut up about it.

        Once you’re getting a fair shake, if the company establishes trust, you can get rid of the union. And the company can save the money they spend trying to ruin your lives on something else instead. Not all companies are trash.

        But most are.

        It’s absolutely vital for governments to promote workers’ ability to unionize and provide employees with rights to protect them from corporate greed.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      My area of work doesn’t have unions.

      That last paragraph is absolutely true. I’ve experienced it first hand.

    • Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I pay around £15 per month in membership fees at my Union. But if it weren’t for them, I’d have lost my house when the energy companies hiked their prices, end everyone else did the same to compensate.

      Was it garaunteed that they’d win these negotiations? No.

      Would I have been better off begging to my managers? Fuck no.

  • molave@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Dues deducted from paycheck” and “typically must go through union instead of your supervisor or manager” are true. At the same time, they’re minor inconveniences compared to what a bad employer does to you.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      As I said in another comment, my dues are automatically paid through my PTO account which in turn is paid into by my employer. So yeah, it’s still my money, but it’s not coming out of my paycheck at all and I honestly don’t even notice it.

      At least in my area, most of your big trade unions have this as an option for members through the IBEW credit union.

    • sverit@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I personally prefer going through the union instead of my supervisor. Less stressful for me.

    • therealrjp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not always necessary to ‘go through the union’ instead of speaking with your manager. For pay, conditions and other disputes, yes, you’d want the collective bargaining of a union to get the best deal. For other things, it’s not always necessary.

      I had a fall at work a couple of years ago. I fractured my ankle and was away from work until it healed and I could work again. When I returned, the problem area that lead to my fall hadn’t been looked at. I raised it with management myself and they dealt with my concerns and rectified the issue. I informed my health and safety union rep of what I was doing and he agreed to take it up if necessary. It wasn’t.

      The company I work for has a long history of working with unions. They obviously have their motivations to improve efficiency and profitability but generally aren’t arseholes about it. The toxic culture I see in other companies only comes about when bosses can get away with murder because employees aren’t able to stand together.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that they have it on this blatant of a propaganda poster means that unions work.

    And going through union for what you need is much more effective and quicker than letting a supervisor/manager drag their feet and kick the ball around, and that’s what makes union dues worth it.

    • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because the manager is incentivized to not help you, while the union is incentivized to help you.

      Unions are game-theoretically necessary.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        If employers have organizations advocating for them, it only makes sense for employees to have the same

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that they have it on this blatant of a propaganda poster means that unions work.

      Not necessarily.

      A poster this blatant means unions are bad for management.

      It doesn’t prove that unions aren’t bad for both workers and management alike. Business isn’t a zero sum game. To show that something helps workers, you need to demonstrate that it helps workers.

      Which is to say, this poster is a bad argument for unions. The success of the writers strike, on the other hand, is a good argument of how unions protect workers from the bad deals management offers.

  • Unaware7013@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No guarantees on pay, benefits, or work rules

    Uuuhhhhhhh, isn’t that the current state and literally what unions are for? Setting guarantees for all that shit?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      No guarantee as in “theoretically, we could fold up our entire business instead of bothering to negotiate”. They won’t, of course, but it’s not liably false (IANAL) because there’s a valid weird hypothetical.

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not a hypothetical: Hostess folded, as did Yellow trucking. Unions can’t save a business from bad business decisions or destructive market forces.

        But businesses fold all the time, union or no union. When business is good, unions make sure the employees get a fair piece of that.

    • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the whole point is having a legally binding contract that sets wages, hours, and working conditions. Also the “going through your union instead of your manager” is super dumb. It’s like saying, “why talk to your lawyer when you can just confess to the police?”

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Typically must go through union instead of your supervisor or manager

    Major plus in my book.

    • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very major, especially because it goes both ways. Hey Manager, if you got a problem with me take it up with my union rep.

  • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Get informed”

    Bold of you to tell people to do something that dangerous, Amazon.

  • float@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “effective due” is probably even negative because the extra money they’ll fight for will be more than the due.

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same with

      No guarantees on pay, benefits or work rules.

      This is also technically true - except your union is going to collectively bargain a binding contract which gets you all those things, and prevents you from being exploited or the employer from randomly changing rules to exploit you.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have no guarantees on pay, benefits or work rules without unions either. The company can change those at any time or never change them at all.

        At least a union will fight for those things on your behalf. A company has no incentive to do so and will actively oppose such things if it hurts their bottom line even slightly.

        • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Correct. Benefits can and do get cut frequently without unions. Benefits cannot be cut in a union under contract, and if they try to cut them on the next contract you have the power to collectively bargain and strike if they do not come to the table and bargain in good faith. The recent WGA strike is an excellent example of all of that.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My dues are automatically paid out of my PTO account and are basically an hour’s worth of wages per month.

      I don’t even notice it.

    • loie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t say if this particular one is real but this definitely tracks in the USA. I’ve worked for companies that have mandatory meetings where anti union consultants will play out this kind of propaganda in real time.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Dunno if this image specifically is real, but anti-union stuff is common in the US.

      I worked this one job where a couple of the employees tried to unionize. It had gotten far enough where there was going to be a vote.

      Well the company sent this snake woman around that personally gave almost everyone one on one talks to convince them that unions are bad and they should vote “no” on unionizing.

      For some reason none of my coworkers took even a second to wonder why the company was so hell bent on getting everyone to vote “no” that they set up one on one personal meetings with some random anti-union lady.

      Yeah, enough people voted “no” that we didn’t get to unionize…


      The one other thing I will say that was a bit baffling was that at a prior job I was working minimum wage and it had a union where I had to pay union dues. Wtf was the union doing where I was making less than minimum wage?? Not much apparently.

    • alex [they, il]@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fellow French - wait until you realize their unions only apply to one company and not a whole industry so they can’t actually do anything on a large scale. This broke me.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait so…having to go through your supervisor and manager is listed as a plus??? america or not, aint noone likes going through that, usually

  • MTLion3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Always love it when the people in charge know something is bad for THEM but good for US and they just throw a tasteful graphic spouting some bullshit on a page to change minds. They did this in Columbus about Issue 1 like a month ago, saying how upping the Majority Vote to 60% for state bills was just a good thing, even though it was just to prepare for issue 1 in November to repeal backwards ass Abortion Laws. It was obvious too since it was like all the pamphlet talked about

  • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why sleep in cotton sheets on a spring mattress for $1 in dues when we can offer this manure-soaked bed of straw for only $5 in wage theft?

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s no guarantee you will get more money! Get the same money or less guaranteed instead!