• jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    smile the whole point of publishers back in the day before the internet was distribution and marketing. no I am not mistaking one for the other.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, you absolutely are. Publishers will typically pay for retail manufacturing costs (so printing, boxing and shipping), but that’s not the same as digital distribution. Digital distribution doesn’t map to shipping game boxes, it maps to retail.

      Which is why games on Steam have deals with publishers, NOT with Valve.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, I’m not. you’re assuming i am. game developers dont generally have the relationships with distributors. the whole point of a publisher is to handle that relationship + the relationship with marketing avenues.

        with digital distribution the role of a publisher is greatly reduced. mostly down to just marketing.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not even a little bit. Man, you sure like to keep digging when given a shovel, huh?

          Look, I’m not here to write a textbook on game publishing, but I do recommend you take that shovel and go dig up some accurate information in the off-chance you’re not just posting whatever autocorrect feeds you as the first word choice.